Jungerstam-Mulders, S. (2003) Uneven Odds The Electoral Success of the Freiheitliche Partie Österreichs, the Vlaams Blok, the Republikaner <strong>and</strong> the Centrumdemocraten under the Conditions Provided by the Political System in Austria, Belgium, Germany <strong>and</strong> the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press. Kamarck, E. (1999) ‘Campaigning on the Internet in the Elections of 1998’, in Kamarck, E. & Nye, J. (eds) Democracy.com? Governance in a Networked World, pp. 99-124. Hollis, NH: Hollis Publishing. Kamarck, E. (2002) ‘Political Campaigning on the Internet: Business as Usual?’, in Kamarck, E. & Nye, J. (eds) Governance.com Democracy in the Information Age, pp. 81-103. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Kluver, R. (2004) ‘Political Culture <strong>and</strong> Information Technology in the 2001 Singapore General Election’, Political Communication 21: 435-58. Kubicek, P. (2001) ‘The Limits of Electoral Democracy in Ukraine’, Democratization 8(2): 117-39. Lijphart, A. (1971) ‘Comparative Politics <strong>and</strong> the Comparative Method’, American Political Science Review 65: 682-93. Lijphart, A. (1994). Electoral Systems <strong>and</strong> Party Systems. A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies 1945-1990. New York: Oxford University Press. Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms <strong>and</strong> Performance in 36 Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press. Lusoli, W. & Ward, J. (2004) ‘Country Report for the Internet <strong>and</strong> Election project, 2004 European Parliament election UK component’, report, Internet <strong>and</strong> Elections project. March, L. (2003) ‘Virtual <strong>Parties</strong> in a virtual world: Russian parties <strong>and</strong> the political Internet’, ECPR Joint Sessions, Edingburgh. Margolis, M. & Resnick, D. (2000) Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace “Revolution”. Thous<strong>and</strong> Oaks, CA: Sage. Margolis, M., Resnick, D. & Levy, J. (2003) ‘Major parties dominate, minor parties struggle US elections <strong>and</strong> the Internet’, in Gibson, R., Nixon, P. & Ward, S. (eds) Political <strong>Parties</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Internet: Net Gain?, pp. 51-69. London: Routledge. Margolis, M., Resnick, D. & Tu, C. (1997) ‘Campaigning on the Internet: <strong>Parties</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>C<strong>and</strong>idates</strong> on the World Wide Web in the 1996 Primary Season’, Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 2(1): 59-78. Miani, M. (2004) ‘Internet & Elections Project Final report EP Election: Italy Country Report.’, report, Internet <strong>and</strong> Elections project. Miethe, T. & Drass, K. (1999) ‘Exploring the Social Context of Instrumental <strong>and</strong> Expressive Homicides: An Application of Qualitative Comparative Analysis’, Journal of Quantitative Criminology 15(1): 1-21. Newell, J. (2001) ‘Italian Political <strong>Parties</strong> on the Web’, Press/Politics 6(4): 60-87. Nixon, P. Ward, S. & Gibson, R. “Conclusions: the net change”, in Gibson, R., Nixon, P. & Ward, S. (eds) Political <strong>Parties</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Internet: Net Gain?, pp. 51-69. London: Routledge. Norris, P. (2001a) A Virtuous Circle. Political Communication in Post-Industrial Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press. Norris, P. (2001b) Digital Divide? Civic Engagement, Information Poverty & the Internet Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press. 55
Norris, P. (2003) ‘Preaching to the Converted? Pluralism, Participation <strong>and</strong> Party Websites’, Party Politics 9(1): 21-45. Norris, P. (2004) Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules <strong>and</strong> Political Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press. Peters, G. (1998) Comparative Politics Theory <strong>and</strong> Methods. New York: New York University Press. Ragin, C. (1989) The Comparative Method. Moving Beyond Quantitative <strong>and</strong> Qualitative Strategies. Los Angeles: University of California Press. Ragin, C. (1994) ‘Introduction to qualitative comparative analysis’, in Janoski, T & Hicks, A. (eds) The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State, pp. 299-319. New York: Cambridge University Press. Semetko, H. & Krasnoboka, N. (2003) ‘The Political Role of the Internet in Societies in Transition Russia <strong>and</strong> Ukraine Compared’, Party Politics 9(1): 77-104. Swanson, D. & Mancini, P. (1996) Politics, Media, <strong>and</strong> Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning <strong>and</strong> Their Consequences. Westport: Praeger Publishers. Tkach-Kawasaki, L. (2003) ‘Politics@Japan Party Competition on the Internet in Japan’, Party Politics 9(1): 105-23. Waits, A. & Foot, K. (2005) ‘Final report on the US Electoral Web Sphere, Internet & Elections Project’, report, Internet <strong>and</strong> Elections Project. Wallis, D. (2001) ‘The Mexican Presidential <strong>and</strong> Congressional Elections of 2000 <strong>and</strong> Democratic Transition’, Bulletin of Latin American Research 20(3): 304-23. Wallis, D. (2003) ‘Democratisation, parties <strong>and</strong> the net: Mexico – model or aberration?’, in Gibson, R., . 56 Nixon, P. & Ward, S. (eds) Political <strong>Parties</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Internet: Net Gain?, pp. 175-94. London: Routledge.
- Page 1 and 2:
Kim Strandberg Studies of Politics
- Page 4:
PARTIES, CANDIDATES AND CITIZENS ON
- Page 7 and 8:
CIP Cataloguing in Publication Stra
- Page 9 and 10:
Jag vill även ta tillfället i akt
- Page 11 and 12:
C. Summary & Conclusions ..........
- Page 13 and 14: List of tables Article I: Table 1.
- Page 16: A. Introduction
- Page 19 and 20: 26; Römmele 2003, 9-11). Therefore
- Page 21 and 22: these scholarly visions (e.g. Corra
- Page 23 and 24: 2003b; Gibson & Ward 2002). Regardi
- Page 25 and 26: Some further comments regarding the
- Page 27 and 28: for citizens’ participation and p
- Page 29 and 30: providing the kind of structure for
- Page 31 and 32: To further examine the central comp
- Page 33 and 34: Scholars have noted that some of th
- Page 35 and 36: • In the third article (Strandber
- Page 37 and 38: References Barber, B. 1984. Strong
- Page 39 and 40: Lusoli, W. 2005b. “The Internet a
- Page 42: B. The articles
- Page 45 and 46: Introduction Two specific theories
- Page 47 and 48: proportional systems. It is therefo
- Page 49 and 50: egulation of political advertising
- Page 51 and 52: Because the study is case-oriented
- Page 53 and 54: the discussion of the variable, the
- Page 55 and 56: Table 1. Operationalizations of the
- Page 57 and 58: There were no contradicting cases f
- Page 59 and 60: dramatically if a different coding
- Page 61 and 62: of democratic status and the usage
- Page 63: References Altheide, D. & Snow, R.
- Page 67 and 68: Appendix B: studies associated with
- Page 69 and 70: ABdE+AbdE = AdE BCdE+BcdE = BdE Fin
- Page 71 and 72: 1. Introduction Voter turnout in th
- Page 73 and 74: integration [9,10]. A study by Tiil
- Page 75 and 76: 3. Data and methodology Our focus o
- Page 77 and 78: provided the bulk of the sites and,
- Page 79 and 80: YLE, the state-owned Finnish Broadc
- Page 81 and 82: 4.4. The on-line candidates: a clos
- Page 83 and 84: 4.4.3. What kind of candidates did
- Page 85 and 86: sources during the campaign. The qu
- Page 87 and 88: The results presented hitherto are
- Page 89 and 90: ecome involved in their campaigns.
- Page 91 and 92: References [1] H. Schmitt, The Euro
- Page 93 and 94: Appendix A. Abbreviated coding temp
- Page 95 and 96: Introduction Party communication ha
- Page 97 and 98: pursuit of executive office, policy
- Page 99 and 100: 2001, 30; Pedersen & Saglie 2005, 3
- Page 101 and 102: and efforts into using the web for
- Page 103 and 104: finally, engaging communication 3.
- Page 105 and 106: Finally, concerning the informative
- Page 107 and 108: Nousiainen 1998, 55-59; Sundberg 19
- Page 109 and 110: sophistication index. These parties
- Page 111 and 112: (cf. Strom 1990, 570), and conseque
- Page 113 and 114: identified two groups of parties on
- Page 115 and 116:
Notes: 1 As of November 16th 2005,
- Page 117 and 118:
Kitchelt, H. 2001. ‘Partisan Comp
- Page 119 and 120:
Appendix: Questionnaire scales Labo
- Page 121 and 122:
Targeting of specific voter segment
- Page 124 and 125:
Article IV On-line Campaigning - An
- Page 126 and 127:
Patterns of candidate on-line elect
- Page 128 and 129:
elements of interest pluralism (cf.
- Page 130 and 131:
The Finnish context As was briefly
- Page 132 and 133:
RQ1: How much predicting power do i
- Page 134 and 135:
stored locally two weeks prior to t
- Page 136 and 137:
Table 2. Logistical regression mode
- Page 138 and 139:
Table 4. Candidate website function
- Page 140 and 141:
Table 5. OLS multiple regression mo
- Page 142 and 143:
Table 6. OLS multiple regression mo
- Page 144 and 145:
affiliated party, even in the candi
- Page 146 and 147:
than their rivals (Margolis et al.
- Page 148 and 149:
References Altheide, David and Robe
- Page 150 and 151:
Norris, Pippa (2001a) A Virtuous Ci
- Page 152 and 153:
Campaigning Additive index: 1 point
- Page 154 and 155:
Article V “Town Hall” Meetings
- Page 156 and 157:
Hence, one must question whether th
- Page 158 and 159:
(Coleman and Goetze, 2001: 16; Norr
- Page 160 and 161:
Barber mentions that it is only whe
- Page 162 and 163:
of user preferences. If internet po
- Page 164 and 165:
Table 2. Average degree of liveline
- Page 166 and 167:
5. Citizen Participation in the deb
- Page 168 and 169:
Over time, there is also a slight,
- Page 170 and 171:
would significantly enhance our und
- Page 172 and 173:
Notes 1 According to the Nua Intern
- Page 174:
Kamarck, E. 1999. ”Campaigning on
- Page 178 and 179:
C. Summary and conclusions A discus
- Page 180 and 181:
perspective, the articles have been
- Page 182 and 183:
predicting candidate website functi
- Page 184 and 185:
articles in the thesis. In general,
- Page 186 and 187:
Finnish voters’ propensity to loo
- Page 188 and 189:
they did not appear to “become mo
- Page 190 and 191:
organizational, financial […] res
- Page 192 and 193:
The real impact of internet politic
- Page 194 and 195:
Norris, P. 2003. “Preaching to th