19.01.2013 Views

Parties, Candidates and Citizens On-Line - Åbo Akademi

Parties, Candidates and Citizens On-Line - Åbo Akademi

Parties, Candidates and Citizens On-Line - Åbo Akademi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

YLE, the state-owned Finnish Broadcasting Company, attracted approximately 60,000<br />

different visitors during the last week of the campaign. All in all, the selector was visited<br />

by more than 100,000 different citizens during the period 1–13 June <strong>and</strong> by more than<br />

80,000 in May. 5 The selector provided by the largest daily, Helsingin Sanomat, was visited<br />

approximately 188,500 times during the campaign. 6 Moreover, the c<strong>and</strong>idates were very<br />

responsive when giving their answers to the questionnaires that made up the five<br />

selectors; the answer rates ranged from 77 to 87 per cent. 7 In addition, two parties set up<br />

their own selectors on their sites allowing for a comparison between the issue views of<br />

the site visitor <strong>and</strong> the c<strong>and</strong>idates of the party in question. In sum, by considering this<br />

additional feature, <strong>and</strong> its’ popularity, the election-related information provided by the<br />

news media’s sites in the 2004 campaign is put in a more favourable light.<br />

4.3. Engagement opportunities provided<br />

The provision of engagement opportunities to the voters is reported in a two-fold way.<br />

First, an additive index assigns one point for the presence of each of 11 engagement<br />

features on a site (Appendix A). Thereafter, we examine the prevalence of each<br />

engagement type on the sites by the different actors. Concerning the actors’ index scores,<br />

the most striking observation is that all actors offered the voters a small range of<br />

engagement opportunities; the mean score for all actors is remarkably low (1.66).<br />

Moreover, the differences between the actors are fairly small. Yet, the parties did<br />

somewhat better (2.27) than the other actors (scores ranging from 0.80 to 1.60). Table 3<br />

gives a detailed overview of the various engagement features provided by the actors.<br />

5 The figures provided by researcher Eija Moisala at YLE’s Audience Research unit. About four million<br />

citizens were entitled to vote in the 2004 elections.<br />

6 The figure provided by Mr. Marko Hamilo at Helsingin Sanomat.<br />

7 The figures were available at the webpages providing the c<strong>and</strong>idate selectors.<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!