19.01.2013 Views

Parties, Candidates and Citizens On-Line - Åbo Akademi

Parties, Candidates and Citizens On-Line - Åbo Akademi

Parties, Candidates and Citizens On-Line - Åbo Akademi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RQ3a: Are there differences in the activity on the discussion boards in different electoral contexts, <strong>and</strong><br />

how is the increased political activity <strong>and</strong> media coverage prior to elections (Asp, 1986: 108) reflected on<br />

the forums?<br />

3. Methods <strong>and</strong> data<br />

The data for the study was collected on six Finnish discussion boards. Four of these<br />

forums are associated with a political party <strong>and</strong> two are independent ‘web portals’. The<br />

Centre Party is represented by two discussion boards; one board open to all citizens <strong>and</strong><br />

one exclusively for party members. An exclusive member forum could theoretically<br />

restrict the number of potential users. However, as the number of members in the Centre<br />

Party is 200,000 4 the potential audience should still be around 100,000 5 users. By including<br />

the member board in the analysis, one can examine the on-line activity of politically<br />

interested citizens. Do party members engage in the opportunities for internal debate<br />

offered on the discussion board? In addition to the two discussion boards of the Centre<br />

Party, the discussion board of the National Coalition Party’s website was included. This<br />

board is open to all citizens but registration is required before gaining access. The<br />

discussion board of the Green League was included as the fourth <strong>and</strong> final board<br />

associated with a political party. This forum is open to all citizens after registration. The<br />

discussion boards associated with political parties were selected mainly based on their<br />

accessibility. Thus, the discussion board of the largest party, the Social Democratic Party,<br />

was excluded as it was shut down during the period of analysis. Moreover, only the<br />

forums of relatively large parties were included in order to keep the potential number of<br />

users as high as possible. Concerning this, the National Coalition Party <strong>and</strong> the Centre<br />

Party are obvious choices as they are both among the top three parties in voter support 6 .<br />

The discussion board of the Green League was included, disregarding the party’s smaller<br />

shares of votes, as the supporters of the party generally belong to the demographic groups<br />

of the population who use the internet at a high rate (Norris, 2001b: 158). Thus, a large<br />

share of the Green League’s supporters ought to have access to internet resources.<br />

The data is further supplemented by two discussion boards not associated with any<br />

political party. These boards are both hosted on an independent web portal called<br />

jippii.fi 7 . A political <strong>and</strong> a non-political discussion board are coded for the same variables<br />

as the forums associated with political parties. Since some citizens might not find their<br />

way around to the parties’ discussion forums, the inclusion of independent forums seems<br />

necessary in order to provide a more holistic picture of the electronic debates. Moreover,<br />

as both independent discussion boards are hosted in the same context (the portal jippii.fi),<br />

a quantitative comparison of the activity on the discussion boards provides an indication<br />

152

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!