21.01.2013 Views

The Roman Army: A Social and Institutional History - Karatunov.net

The Roman Army: A Social and Institutional History - Karatunov.net

The Roman Army: A Social and Institutional History - Karatunov.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

180<br />

ROMAN FORTRESSES, FORTS, AND FORT L E T S<br />

A typical <strong>Roman</strong> fort of the Imperial period was<br />

shaped like a modern playing card, with two short<br />

sides <strong>and</strong> two long sides, <strong>and</strong> rounded corn e r s .<br />

This is the evolved version of a <strong>Roman</strong> fort, since<br />

the earlier fortified camps of the early Empire were<br />

not so regularly shaped <strong>and</strong> were not generally designed<br />

as permanent bases for troops. <strong>The</strong> fort <strong>and</strong><br />

supply depot at Rödgen in Germany was ovoid in<br />

shape, <strong>and</strong> while the fortress of Haltern was more<br />

regular in plan, it does not compare with the later<br />

permanent forts of the Empire.<br />

Typically, early <strong>Roman</strong> forts were built of earth<br />

<strong>and</strong> turf ramparts (called m u rus caespiticus) ,<br />

topped by a timber breastwork, with access by timber<br />

gateways with towers on either side. <strong>The</strong>re were<br />

usually interval towers ranged along the walls <strong>and</strong><br />

at each corn e r. Forts were usually surrounded by<br />

one or more ditches, shaped like a letter V but with<br />

an aptly labelled “ankle-breaker” drainage channel<br />

at the bottom. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Roman</strong>s usually took this<br />

drainage feature seriously, judging by the number<br />

of excavations that show that the ditch had been<br />

cleaned out <strong>and</strong> squared off. In the second century<br />

AD from the reign of Trajan onward, when the majority<br />

of forts had become permanent bases rather<br />

than semipermanent ones while the provinces were<br />

pacified <strong>and</strong> <strong>Roman</strong>ized, forts <strong>and</strong> fortresses were<br />

g e n e r a l l y, but not universally, built of stone. In<br />

some cases this meant refronting existing forts by<br />

cutting back the turf rampart, <strong>and</strong> in others building<br />

in stone from the outset.<br />

Depending on the type of unit stationed in them,<br />

forts varied in size from 0.6 hectares for the small<br />

n u m e ru s f o rts in Germany <strong>and</strong> Dacia, to 20<br />

hectares for a legion. <strong>The</strong>re were a few double legionary<br />

fortresses such as Vetera (modern Xanten,<br />

G e rmany) <strong>and</strong> Mogontiacum (modern Mainz, Germany)<br />

until the failed revolt of Saturninus, who<br />

g a t h e red the combined savings of his legionaries<br />

to attempt a coup against the Emperor Domitian.<br />

After this, Domitian decreed that no two legions<br />

were to be housed together.<br />

Plan of a legionary barrack block. <strong>The</strong> centurion lived in a<br />

well-appointed house at the end of the block, while eight<br />

men of each contubernia or tent group shared two ro o m s<br />

between them. <strong>The</strong>oretically there should be ten double<br />

rooms, as shown in this plan, to accommodate the 80<br />

men of the century, but in practice there were often<br />

eleven or twelve sets of rooms, for reasons which no one<br />

can satisfactorily explain. (Redrawn by John Clark)<br />

<strong>The</strong> internal arrangements of fort resses <strong>and</strong><br />

f o rts was on the whole st<strong>and</strong>ardized, but with regional<br />

or local variations. <strong>The</strong> center range usually<br />

housed the headquarters building (p r i n c i p i a) ,<br />

flanked by the comm<strong>and</strong>er’s house (p r a e t o r i u m)<br />

<strong>and</strong> the granaries (horreae). <strong>The</strong>re were four main<br />

s t reets within the fort, <strong>and</strong> the orientation of the<br />

fort was taken from the direction that headquarters<br />

faced. <strong>The</strong> road running across the fort in front of<br />

the headquarters was the via principalis, with its<br />

two gates labeled for the right <strong>and</strong> left sides (porta<br />

principalis dextra <strong>and</strong> p o rta principalis sinistra) .<br />

<strong>The</strong> road that connected the principia to the front<br />

gate (p o rta praetoria) was the via praetoria, a n d<br />

behind the headquarters another road, the via decumana,<br />

ran to the rear gate (porta decumana).<br />

In several forts archaeological evidence shows<br />

that there were other communal buildings, for example<br />

the workshop (fabrica) where metalworking,<br />

woodworking, <strong>and</strong> repair of equipment <strong>and</strong><br />

weapons would take place. <strong>The</strong>re was also a hospital<br />

(v a l e t u d i n a r i u m). It should be acknowledged<br />

that from the ground plans alone, the workshops<br />

<strong>and</strong> the hospitals might have been confused, each<br />

consisting of small rooms off a central court y a rd ,<br />

but in a few cases medical instruments have been<br />

found, which strongly supports the label “hospital.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> forts on Hadrian’s Wall at Wallsend <strong>and</strong><br />

Housesteads, <strong>and</strong> the fortresses at Vetera (modern<br />

Xanten, Germany) <strong>and</strong> Novaesium (modern Neuss,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!