21.01.2013 Views

The Roman Army: A Social and Institutional History - Karatunov.net

The Roman Army: A Social and Institutional History - Karatunov.net

The Roman Army: A Social and Institutional History - Karatunov.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

H i s t o r i c a l Ba c k g r o u n d 69<br />

lished mostly in existing cities, sometimes by dispossessing the original inhabitants.<br />

L<strong>and</strong> allotments went with the foundation of each colony, since no city<br />

can survive without its surrounding l<strong>and</strong>s to produce food. <strong>The</strong> majority of the<br />

colonies established in Italy had Latin status rather than full <strong>Roman</strong> citizenship.<br />

Th ey were all owed con s i dera ble auton omy, but they were also instru m ents of<br />

voluntary <strong>Roman</strong>ization.<br />

Co l onies of <strong>Roman</strong> citi zens with full vo ting ri ghts (civi t a tes optimo iure)<br />

were fewer in nu m ber than Latin co l onies <strong>and</strong> were largely re s tri cted to the<br />

coastal towns, where it was once thought that the prime duty of the citizens was<br />

to provide garrison troops, an opinion that has since been revised. <strong>Roman</strong> citizenship<br />

could occ a s i on a lly be con ferred on whole town s , <strong>and</strong> in the later Republic<br />

it could be bestowed on individuals. Full voting rights could be exercised<br />

only by personal attendance in Rome. <strong>Roman</strong> citizenship was a prized asset, <strong>and</strong><br />

eventually Rome started to ration the grant of full voting rights. Instead, a new<br />

kind of grant called civitas sine suffragio was instituted, which bestowed the legal<br />

rights <strong>and</strong> privileges that went with citizenship, without the voting powers. This<br />

relationship with Rome was extended to some of the towns of Latium, Campania,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Etruria. As with the allied states, the military obligations to fight on behalf<br />

of Rome remained in place.<br />

<strong>The</strong> first permanent colony outside Italy was set up in 118 bc at Narbo in<br />

Proven ce , Fra n ce (the modern name derives from provi n ci a , as the area was<br />

once designated as the province before it became known as Gallia Narbonensis).<br />

Toward the end of the second century bc, more colonies were established in<br />

Africa <strong>and</strong> Gaul, mostly to accommodate discharged veterans from the armies;<br />

t h en under Ju l ius Cae s a r, Au g u s tu s , <strong>and</strong> su cceeding em perors , the practi ce<br />

s pre ad to the Rh i n e , S p a i n , <strong>and</strong> the eastern provi n ce s . <strong>The</strong> co l onies ra n ked<br />

higher than the other cities of the Empire, <strong>and</strong> emperors could confer colonial<br />

status on settlements.<br />

As the <strong>Roman</strong>s acqu i red more terri tory <strong>and</strong> ex ten ded their influ en ce over<br />

the peri ph eral states <strong>and</strong> tri be s , a different kind of rel a ti onship with non -<br />

<strong>Roman</strong> peoples was developed (Braund, 1984). Modern historians call this system<br />

client kingship, but a better term would be friendly king, since the <strong>Roman</strong>s<br />

used the phrase rex sociusque et amicus, denoting a king who was both an ally<br />

<strong>and</strong> a friend of the <strong>Roman</strong> people, under an arrangement that was ratified by<br />

the Senate. This was a personal agreement between the individual king or queen<br />

<strong>and</strong> the sovereign <strong>Roman</strong> people, through the medium of <strong>Roman</strong> magistrates.<br />

When the friendly ruler died, the relationship could be terminated, or it could<br />

be renewed with the successor. Although the agreement did not involve outright<br />

annexation, the ultimate fate of the kingdoms of many friendly kings was exactly<br />

that.<br />

Rome su pported the cl i ent ru l ers in their own kingdom s , <strong>and</strong> the cl i en t s<br />

were expected to provide troops <strong>and</strong> to use their local knowledge to aid <strong>Roman</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!