24.01.2013 Views

McKay, Donald. "Front matter" Multimedia Environmental Models ...

McKay, Donald. "Front matter" Multimedia Environmental Models ...

McKay, Donald. "Front matter" Multimedia Environmental Models ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

©2001 CRC Press LLC<br />

CHAPTER 6<br />

Advection and Reactions<br />

6.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

In Level I calculations, it is assumed that the chemical is conserved; i.e., it is<br />

neither destroyed by reactions nor conveyed out of the evaluative environment by<br />

flows in phases such as air and water. These assumptions can be quite misleading<br />

when determining of the impact of a given discharge or emission of chemical.<br />

First, if a chemical, such as glucose, is reactive and survives for only 10 hours<br />

as a result of its susceptibility to rapid biodegradation, it must pose less of a threat<br />

than PCBs, which may survive for over 10 years. But the Level I calculation treats<br />

them identically. Second, some chemical may leave the area of discharge rapidly as<br />

a result of evaporation into air, to be removed by advection in winds. The contamination<br />

problem is solved locally, but only by shifting it to another location. It is<br />

important to know if this will occur. Indeed, recently, considerable attention is being<br />

paid to substances that are susceptible to long-range transport. Third, it is possible<br />

that, in a given region, local contamination is largely a result of inflow of chemical<br />

from upwind or upstream regions. Local efforts to reduce contamination by controlling<br />

local sources may therefore be frustrated, because most of the chemical is<br />

inadvertently imported. This problem is at the heart of the Canada–U.S., and Scandinavia–Germany–U.K.<br />

squabbles over acid precipitation. It is also a concern in<br />

relatively pristine areas such as the Arctic and Antarctic, where residents have little<br />

or no control over the contamination of their environments.<br />

In this chapter, we address these issues and devise methods of calculating the<br />

effect of advective inflow and outflow and degrading reactions on local chemical<br />

fate and subsequent exposures. It must be emphasized that, once a chemical is<br />

degraded, this does not necessarily solve the problem. Toxicologists rarely miss an<br />

opportunity to point out reactions, such as mercury methylation or benzo(a)pyrene<br />

oxidation, in which the product of the reaction is more harmful than the parent<br />

compound. For our immediate purposes, we will be content to treat only the parent<br />

compound. Assessment of degradation products is best done separately by having<br />

the degradation product of one chemical treated as formation of another.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!