24.01.2013 Views

McKay, Donald. "Front matter" Multimedia Environmental Models ...

McKay, Donald. "Front matter" Multimedia Environmental Models ...

McKay, Donald. "Front matter" Multimedia Environmental Models ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Therefore,<br />

©2001 CRC Press LLC<br />

N = Df = 10 9 ¥ 10 –6 = 1000 mol/h<br />

Treatment of transport to the stratosphere is somewhat more difficult. We can<br />

conceive of parcels of air that migrate from the troposphere to the stratosphere at<br />

an average, continuous rate, G m 3 /h, being replaced by clean stratospheric air that<br />

migrates downward at the same rate. We can thus calculate the D value. As discussed<br />

by Neely and Mackay (1982), this rate should correspond to a residence time of the<br />

troposphere of about 60 years, i.e., G is V/t. Thus, if V is 6 ¥ 10 9 and t is 5.25 ¥<br />

10 5 h, G is 11400 m 3 /h. This rate is very slow and is usually insignificant, but there<br />

are situations in which it is important.<br />

We may be interested in calculating the amount of chemical that actually reaches<br />

the stratosphere, for example, freons that catalyze the decomposition of ozone. This<br />

slow rate is thus important from the viewpoint of the receiving stratospheric phase,<br />

but is not an important loss from the delivering, or tropospheric, phase. Second, if<br />

a chemical is very stable and is only slowly removed from the atmosphere by reaction<br />

or deposition processes, then transfer to the troposphere may be a significant mechanism<br />

of removal. Certain volatile halogenated hydrocarbons tend to be in this class.<br />

If we emit a chemical into the evaluative world at a steady rate by emissions and<br />

allow for no removal mechanisms whatsoever, its concentrations will continue to<br />

build up indefinitely. Such situations are likely to arise if we view the evaluative<br />

world as merely a scaled-down version of the entire global environment. There is<br />

certainly advective flow of chemical from, for example, the United States to Canada,<br />

but there is no advective flow of chemical out of the entire global atmospheric<br />

environment, except for the small amounts that transfer to the stratosphere. Whether<br />

advection is included depends upon the system being simulated. In general, the<br />

smaller the system, the shorter the advection residence time, and the more important<br />

advection becomes.<br />

Sediment burial is the process by which chemical is conveyed from the active<br />

mixed layer of accessible sediment into inaccessible buried layers. As was discussed<br />

earlier, this is a rather naive picture of a complex process, but at least it is a starting<br />

point for calculations. The reality is that the mixed surface sediment layer is rising,<br />

eventually filling the lake. Typical burial rates are 1 mm/year, the material being<br />

buried being typically 25% solids, 75% water. But as it “moves” to greater depths,<br />

water becomes squeezed out. Mathematically, the D value consists of two terms,<br />

the burial rate of solids and that of water.<br />

For example, if a lake has an area of 10 7 m 2 and has a burial rate of 1 mm/year,<br />

the total rate of burial is 10,000 m 3 /year or 1.14 m 3 /h, consisting of perhaps 25%<br />

solids, i.e., 0.29 m 3 /h of solids (G S) and 0.85 m 3 /h of water (G W). The rate of loss<br />

of chemical is then<br />

G SC S + G WC W = G SZ Sf + G WZ Wf = f(D AS + D AW)<br />

Usually, there is a large solid to pore water partition coefficient; therefore, C S<br />

greatly exceeds C W or, alternatively, Z S is very much greater than Z W, and the term

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!