24.01.2013 Views

McKay, Donald. "Front matter" Multimedia Environmental Models ...

McKay, Donald. "Front matter" Multimedia Environmental Models ...

McKay, Donald. "Front matter" Multimedia Environmental Models ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8.1.2 Model-Building Strategies<br />

The general model-building strategy is first to evaluate the system being simulated,<br />

then to decide how many compartments and thus mass balances are required.<br />

There is a compelling incentive to start with a simple model then build up complexity<br />

only when justified. The volumes and bulk Z values are deduced for each compartment.<br />

All inputs and outputs are identified, preferably as arrows on a mass balance<br />

diagram. Equations are written for each flux, either as an emission or a Df product.<br />

For a steady-state model, the inputs are equated to outputs for each of the n compartments,<br />

leading to n equations with n unknown fugacities. These equations are<br />

solved, either algebraically or using a matrix method.<br />

For a dynamic system, the differential equations for each medium are written in<br />

the form<br />

©2001 CRC Press LLC<br />

d(VZf)/dt = inputs – outputs mol/h<br />

These equations are then solved, either analytically or numerically, for a defined<br />

initial condition and defined inputs. The integration time step can be selected as 5%<br />

of the shortest half-time for transport or transformation and the stability of the result<br />

checked by decreasing the time step systematically. Integration is best done using<br />

a Runge–Kutta method, but the simple Euler’s method may be adequate.<br />

Results should be checked for a mass balance. For steady-state models, this is<br />

simply a comparison of inputs and outputs for each compartment. For dynamic<br />

models, the initial mass plus the cumulative inputs should equal the final mass and<br />

the cumulative outputs. To gain a pictorial appreciation of the results, a mass balance<br />

diagram should be drawn listing all inputs and outputs beside the appropriate arrows.<br />

The dominant processes then become apparent.<br />

It is often useful to play “sensitivity games” with the model to gain an appreciation<br />

of how variation in an input quantity such as an emission rate, Z value, or D<br />

value propagates through the calculation and affects the results. An input quantity<br />

can be increased by 1% and the effect on the desired output quantity determined.<br />

The best way to quantify this sensitivity S is to deduce<br />

S = (Doutput/output)/( Dinput/input)<br />

For example, if the input quantity of 100 is increased to 101 and the output<br />

quantity changes from 1000 to 1005, then S is (5/1000)/(1/100) or 0.5. This is<br />

actually an estimate of the partial derivative of log output with respect to log input,<br />

and it is dimensionless. For linear systems of the types treated here, all values of S<br />

should be less than 1.0. It may be useful to list the input parameters, deduce S for<br />

each, then rank them in order of decreasing S. The most sensitive parameters, for<br />

which the most accurate data are necessary, are then identified. Often, the sensitivity<br />

of a parameter is surprisingly small, and only a rough estimate is needed. It may be<br />

desirable to revisit and improve the accuracy of the estimates of most sensitive<br />

parameters.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!