24.01.2013 Views

McKay, Donald. "Front matter" Multimedia Environmental Models ...

McKay, Donald. "Front matter" Multimedia Environmental Models ...

McKay, Donald. "Front matter" Multimedia Environmental Models ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Another useful quantity is the ratio of fugacity to some reference fugacity such<br />

as the vapor pressure of liquid benzene. This is a dimensionless quantity and is<br />

termed activity.<br />

Activity can also be used as an equilibrium criterion. This proves<br />

to be preferable for substances such as ions, metals, or polymers that do not appreciably<br />

evaporate and thus cannot establish vapor phase concentrations and partial<br />

pressures.<br />

Our task, then, is to start with a concentration of solute chemical in one phase,<br />

from this deduce the chemical potential, fugacity, or activity, argue that these equilibrium<br />

criteria will be equal in the other phase, and then calculate the corresponding<br />

concentration in the second phase. We therefore require recipes for deducing C from<br />

f and vice versa. This approach is depicted at the bottom of Figure 5.1.<br />

The partition coefficient approach contains the inherent assumption that, whatever<br />

the factors are that are used to convert C1<br />

to f1<br />

and C2<br />

to f2,<br />

the ratio of these<br />

factors is constant over the range of concentration of interest. Thus, it is not actually<br />

necessary to calculate the fugacities; their use is sidestepped. In the fugacity<br />

approach, no such assumption is made, and the individual calculations are undertaken.<br />

We can illustrate these approaches with an example.<br />

Worked Example 5.1<br />

Benzene is present in water at a specified temperature and a concentration C<br />

of 1 mol/m3<br />

(78 g/m3).<br />

What is the equilibrium concentration in air C ?<br />

1. Partition coefficient approach<br />

Therefore,<br />

©2001 CRC Press LLC<br />

K21<br />

is 0.2, i.e., C2/C1<br />

C2<br />

= K21C1<br />

= 0.2 ¥ 1 = 0.2 mol/m3<br />

= 15.6 g/m3<br />

1. Fugacity approach<br />

Using techniques devised later, we find that, for water under these conditions,<br />

f<br />

1<br />

C<br />

2<br />

= C1/Z1<br />

= Z2f2<br />

= C1/0.002<br />

= 500 Pa = f2<br />

= 0.0004f<br />

2<br />

= 0.2 mol/m3<br />

2<br />

= 15.6 g/m3<br />

Clearly, the problem is to determine the conversion factors Z2<br />

and Z1,<br />

or K21,<br />

which is their ratio. Care must be taken to avoid confusing K21<br />

with its reciprocal<br />

K12<br />

or C1/C2,<br />

which in this case has a value of 5.<br />

We therefore face the task of developing methods of estimating Z values that<br />

relate concentration and fugacity, and partition coefficients that are ratios of Z values.<br />

The theoretical foundations are set out in Section 5.3 and result in a set of working<br />

equations applicable to the air-water-octanol system. The three solubilities (or<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!