24.01.2013 Views

McKay, Donald. "Front matter" Multimedia Environmental Models ...

McKay, Donald. "Front matter" Multimedia Environmental Models ...

McKay, Donald. "Front matter" Multimedia Environmental Models ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(1982), Baum (1997) and Leo (2000). Extensive databases are also available as<br />

reviewed by Baum (1997). Octanol was selected because it has a similar carbon to<br />

oxygen ratio as lipids, is readily available in pure form, and is only sparingly soluble<br />

in water (4.5 mol/m 3 ). The solubility of water in octanol of 2300 mol/m 3 , however,<br />

is quite large (Baum, 1997). The molar volumes of these phases are 18 ¥ 10 –6 m 3 /mol<br />

and 120 ¥ 10 –6 m 3 /mol, a ratio of 0.15. It follows that K OW is 0.15 g W/g O.<br />

K OW is a measure of hydrophobicity, i.e., the tendency of a chemical to “hate”<br />

or partition out of water. As was discussed earlier, it can be viewed as a ratio of<br />

solubilities in octanol and water but, in most cases of liquid chemicals, there is no<br />

real solubility, because octanol and the liquid are miscible. The “solubility” of<br />

organic chemicals in octanol tends to be fairly constant in the range 200 to 2000<br />

mol/m 3 , thus variation in K OW between chemicals is primarily due to variation in<br />

water solubility. It is therefore misleading to assert that K OW describes lipophilicity<br />

or “love for lipids,” because most organic chemicals “love” lipids equally, but they<br />

“hate” water quite differently. Viewed in terms of Z values, K OW is Z O/Z W. Z O is<br />

(relatively) constant for organic chemicals; however, Z W varies greatly and is very<br />

small (relatively) for hydrophobic substances.<br />

Because K OW varies over such a large range, from approximately 0.1 to 10 7 , it<br />

is common to express it as log K OW. It is a disastrous mistake to use log K OW in a<br />

calculation when K OW should be used!<br />

K OW is usually measured by equilibrating layers of water and octanol containing<br />

the solute of interest at subsaturation conditions and analyzing both phases. If K OW<br />

is high, the concentration in water is necessarily low, and even a small quantity of<br />

emulsified octanol in the aqueous phase can significantly increase the apparent<br />

concentration. A “slow stirring” method is usually adopted to avoid emulsion formation.<br />

An alternative is to use a generator column in which water is flowed over<br />

a packing containing octanol and the dissolved chemical.<br />

5.4.4 Octanol-Air Partition Coefficients<br />

This partition coefficient is invaluable for predicting the extent to which a<br />

substance partitions from the atmosphere to organic media including soils, vegetation,<br />

and aerosol particles. It can be estimated as K OW/K AW or measured directly,<br />

usually by flowing air through a column containing a packing saturated with octanol<br />

with the solute in solution. Values of K OA can be very large, i.e., up to 10 12 for<br />

substances of very low volatility such as DDT, and values are especially high at low<br />

temperatures. Harner et al. (2000) have reported data for this coefficient and cite<br />

other data and measurement methods.<br />

5.4.5 Solubility in Water<br />

This property is of importance as a measure of the activity coefficient in aqueous<br />

solution, which in turn affects air-water and octanol-water partitioning. It can be<br />

regarded as a partition coefficient between the pure phase and water, but the ratio<br />

of concentrations is not calculated. A comprehensive discussion is given in the text<br />

by Yalkowsky and Banerjee (1992), and estimation methods are described by Mackay<br />

©2001 CRC Press LLC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!