24.01.2013 Views

McKay, Donald. "Front matter" Multimedia Environmental Models ...

McKay, Donald. "Front matter" Multimedia Environmental Models ...

McKay, Donald. "Front matter" Multimedia Environmental Models ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

e achieved in 10 days. Detractors of steady-state models point with glee to situations<br />

in which the modeler will be dead long before steady state is achieved.<br />

Proponents of steady-state models respond that, although they have not specifically<br />

treated the unsteady-state situation, their equations do contain much of the<br />

key “response time” information, which can be extracted with the use of some<br />

intelligence. The response time in the unsteady-state Example 6.5 was 93 hours,<br />

which was SVZ/SD. This is identical to the overall residence time, t, in Example<br />

6.2. The response time of an unsteady-state Level II system is equivalent to the<br />

residence time in a steady-state Level II system. By inspection of the magnitude of<br />

groups, VZ/D, or the reciprocal rate constants that occur in steady-state analysis, it<br />

is possible to determine the likely unsteady-state behavior. This is bad news to those<br />

who enjoy setting up and solving differential equations, because “back-of-theenvelope”<br />

calculations often show that it is not necessary to undertake a complicated<br />

unsteady-state analysis.<br />

Indeed, when calculating D values for loss from a medium, it is good practice<br />

to calculate the ratio VZ/D, where VZ refers to the source medium. This is the<br />

characteristic time of loss, or specifically the time required for that process to reduce<br />

the concentration to e –1 of its initial value if it were the only loss process. In some<br />

cases, we have an intuitive feeling for what that time should be. We can then check<br />

that the D value is reasonable.<br />

6.6 THE NATURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REACTIONS<br />

The most important environmental reaction processes are biodegradation, hydrolysis,<br />

oxidation, and photolysis. We treat each process briefly below with the view<br />

to establishing methods by which the rate of the reaction can be characterized, and<br />

giving references to authoritative reviews.<br />

6.6.1 Biodegradation<br />

Microbiologists are usually quick to point out that the process of microbial<br />

conversion of chemicals in the environment is exceedingly complex. The rate of<br />

conversion depends on the nature of the chemical compound; on the amount and<br />

condition of enzymes that may be present in various organisms in various states of<br />

activation and availability to perform the chemical conversion; on the availability<br />

of nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and oxygen; as well as pH, temperature,<br />

and the presence of other substances that may help or hinder the conversion process.<br />

Virtually all organic chemicals are susceptible to microbial conversion or biodegradation.<br />

Notable among the slowly degrading or recalcitrant compounds are highmolecular-weight<br />

compounds such as the humic acids, certain terpenes that appear<br />

to have structures that are too difficult for enzymes to attack, and many organohalogen<br />

substances. Generally, water-soluble organic chemicals are fairly readily<br />

biodegraded. Over evolutionary time, enzymes have adapted and evolved the capability<br />

of handling most naturally occurring organic compounds. When presented<br />

with certain synthetic organic compounds that do not occur in nature (notably the<br />

©2001 CRC Press LLC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!