28.01.2013 Views

Open Access PDF - Sven Kullander

Open Access PDF - Sven Kullander

Open Access PDF - Sven Kullander

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

386<br />

Discussion<br />

Species diversity. Despite being one of the most<br />

colourful, well-known, and most commercial of<br />

the genera of cichlids, of importance to artisanal<br />

as well as tourism based sport fishing, and among<br />

the largest fishes in the Neotropics, the taxonomic<br />

confusion in Cichla has remained considerable.<br />

A major source of confusion has been the<br />

obvious acceptance in species of Cichla of much<br />

more than modest variability in colour pattern,<br />

both ontogenetic and between individuals, as well<br />

as a traditional recognition of just a few species.<br />

This has been possible because most authors have<br />

only dealt with very few specimens or a restricted<br />

geographical region. In this paper, covering a<br />

wider geographic area, we have been able to<br />

organise phenotypic variation within the genus<br />

into spatially clustered units representing 15<br />

distinct phylogenetic species.<br />

The species diversity of Cichla is thus demonstrated<br />

to be much greater than indicated by<br />

current literature. Nevertheless, we believe the<br />

work on a revision of Cichla has just started. Our<br />

species accounts include references to samples<br />

that cannot be satisfactorily assigned, and some<br />

species are still known only from a few specimens.<br />

Huge areas within the geographical range of the<br />

genus have not been sampled for fishes. We expect<br />

that there may likely exist between 20 and 30<br />

species of Cichla, which require large series of<br />

specimens and more extensive sampling to be<br />

located and diagnosed. Hopefully, this revision<br />

can inspire more efforts in further revising the<br />

genus.<br />

Morphometric and meristic variation. Scale and<br />

fin counts are moderately efficient in separating<br />

species, and are summarised in Tables 2-10. The<br />

lateral scale counts (Table 2) span from 67 to 128,<br />

comparable only to Crenicichla and Teleocichla<br />

among other Neotropical cichlid genera. Intraspecific<br />

ranges varies from 8 to 32, apparently correlated<br />

both with sample size and maximum scale<br />

number. Large-scaled species, C. ocellaris, C. orinocensis,<br />

C. nigromaculata, C. monoculus, C. kelberi,<br />

C. pleiozona, C. melaniae, C. melaniae, and C. thyrorus<br />

generally possess less than 90 E1 scales,<br />

whereas remaining, small-scaled species, generally<br />

possess more than 90 scales (C. piquiti and<br />

C. pinima down to 83 and 86 respectively). The<br />

overlap is considerable in the genus as a whole,<br />

and there are no instances of normal distribution.<br />

The slender species tend to have more scales.<br />

Three potential low frequency counts occur in the<br />

distribution (Table 2, Fig. 4), potentially distinguishing<br />

classes of scale counts. The first at 81<br />

scales (3 specimens) separates C. ocellaris, C. monoculus<br />

and C. mirianae as having lower scale<br />

counts. At 88 scales (2 specimens) C. orinocensis,<br />

C. nigromaculata, C. kelberi, C. melaniae, and C. thyrorus<br />

are separated from the small-scaled species<br />

C. piquiti, C. jariina, C. pinima, C. vazzoleri, and<br />

C. intermedia, and at about 110 scales (3 specimens)<br />

C. temensis separates from the rest. With this interpretation,<br />

only C. kelberi significantly spans<br />

over the drop at 88 scales. Alternatively, a drop<br />

at 92-93 scales (3 specimens each) separates largescaled<br />

and small-scaled species, with two species<br />

transcending, C. piquiti and C. pinima.<br />

Cichla is occasionally diagnosed as having a<br />

continuous lateral line as young, frequently becoming<br />

discontinuous in the adult (Eigenmann,<br />

1912; Newsome, 1971; Stiassny, 1982, Webb, 1990)<br />

in contrast with most cichlids, which have a<br />

dorsal anterior lateral line section and a midaxial<br />

posterior section at all sizes. However, a continuous<br />

lateral line (Table 3) occurs frequently (61-<br />

85 % of the specimens) only in four species, viz.<br />

C. ocellaris, C. thyrorus, C. temensis, and C. intermedia.<br />

The condition is exceptional (4-7 %) in<br />

C. orinocensis, C. pleiozona, and C. piquiti, and infrequent<br />

in C. pinima (36 %) and C. vazzoleri (15 %).<br />

Three of six specimens of C. jariina possess continuous<br />

lateral line. As with the E1 scale counts,<br />

there is no normal distribution and ranges overlap<br />

for lateral line scale counts, with small-scaled<br />

species tending to have more lateral line scales.<br />

Discontinuous lateral line occurs in all species<br />

of Cichla. Counts of scales in the upper lateral line<br />

(Table 4) vary similar to scale counts in the E1<br />

row and continuous lateral line. The number of<br />

scales in the lower lateral line (Table 5) is more<br />

restricted, with C. temensis, C. vazzoleri, C. pinima,<br />

and C. piquiti having slightly higher numbers than<br />

the rest, but also greater variation. The overlap<br />

between species is almost complete. There is no<br />

indication of an ontogenetic transition from continuous<br />

to discontinuous state in any of the species.<br />

The early development of the lateral line<br />

tubes is bidirectional (cf. Webb, 1990), with caudad<br />

succession in the anterior (upper) sequence<br />

and rostrad succession in the posterior (lower)<br />

sequence. Some of the variation in species usually<br />

possessing a continuous lateral line, observed<br />

<strong>Kullander</strong> & Ferreira: Review of Cichla

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!