28.01.2013 Views

Open Access PDF - Sven Kullander

Open Access PDF - Sven Kullander

Open Access PDF - Sven Kullander

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

380<br />

C. pinima, C. vazzoleri, and C. intermedia (Table 2).<br />

Among those C. pinima and C. vazzoleri are most<br />

similar in colour pattern.<br />

Most specimens of C. temensis have bilaterally<br />

continuous lateral line, whereas in C. pinima<br />

the common condition is to have discontinuous<br />

lateral line, and in C. vazzoleri almost all specimens<br />

have discontinuous lateral line. Unlike C. vazzo leri<br />

and C. pinima, C. temensis never develops dark<br />

ocellated blotches on the dorsum, and the vertical<br />

bars remain entire and at all sizes instead of at<br />

least bar 1 forming a distinct ocellated blotch. At<br />

some medium sizes, however, the dorsal blotches<br />

of C. vazzoleri may be overlooked and the<br />

general appearance is similar to C. temensis, e.g.,<br />

in the specimen shown in Figure 80, especially<br />

since the light spots along the side may be<br />

slightly elongate in C. vazzoleri.<br />

Even with a synonymy of six names, no type<br />

material is available for any of the nominal species<br />

and the synonymy of C. temensis has to be established<br />

on the basis of descriptions. As there is no<br />

difference in opinion between different recent<br />

authors as to the identity of C. temensis, and the<br />

published descriptions and figures for the nominal<br />

species included in C. temensis give a fair or<br />

strong idea of what species is considered, there<br />

seems to be no need for a neotype designation at<br />

this moment.<br />

The original descriptions of C. atabapensis and<br />

C. temensis (Humboldt & Valenciennes, 1821: 168-<br />

169) are very brief and there are no figures to<br />

facilitate recognition of the species. Humboldt<br />

writes (translated from the French):<br />

“I have noted in my diary two more species of<br />

Cichla [in addition to C. orinocensis], with the following<br />

characters.<br />

“Cichla atabapensis.<br />

“Pavon of Rio Atabapo: same form as Cichla orinocensis,<br />

but instead of four blotches, four transverse<br />

very broad, blue-black areas bordered with gold.<br />

It is also encountered in the portions of the Orinoco<br />

where the waters are not so fast; but the<br />

variety most agreeable for food is the one from<br />

the Rio Atabapo, a river with black, crystalline<br />

waters” (M. Valenciennes supposes, with reason,<br />

that C. atabapensis in my manuscript is C. ocellaris,<br />

Schneid., Pl. LXVI.)<br />

“C. temensis.<br />

“Pavon of Temi: same shape; no transverse bands,<br />

but four rows of small yellow spots. A single very<br />

large spot on the tail.<br />

“[Latin diagnosis, translated:] Green body, decorated<br />

with small yellow spots arranged in four<br />

longitudinal rows. A single large blue yellowmargined<br />

spot on tail.”<br />

It is thus evident that no specimens were ever<br />

preserved of either C. temensis of C. atabapensis.<br />

The species can be identified only with reference<br />

to the colour pattern in combination with the<br />

geographic distribution indicated by Humboldt.<br />

Of the species occuring in the area only one species<br />

displays a prominent pattern of four (or five)<br />

horizontal rows of yellow (or white) spots along<br />

the side (young and non-breeding adults, possibly<br />

breeding females) as well as three (although<br />

Humboldt counts four) prominent, wide, black,<br />

thinly light-margined vertical bars on the side,<br />

and that species is here identified as C. temensis.<br />

<strong>Kullander</strong> (2003: 621) placed C. atabapensis in the<br />

synonymy of C. temensis, thereby acting as first<br />

reviser, fixing the priority order of the names.<br />

The other species occurring or expected to<br />

occur in the upper Rio Orinoco area, C. orinocensis<br />

and C. intermedia, can be distinguished by their<br />

colour pattern. The former was correctly distinguished<br />

by Humboldt as C. orinocensis and is<br />

characterised by three prominent ocellar blotches<br />

on the side. Cichla intermedia has a series of several<br />

narrow vertical bars along the middle of the<br />

side. Amazonian species, particularly C. vazzoleri<br />

and C. pinima, would equally well suit Humboldt’s<br />

colour pattern description, but occur<br />

outside Humboldt’s collecting area.<br />

No types are preserved of either Cychla flavomaculata<br />

or C. trifasciata Jardine (1843), both reported<br />

from the Rio Negro and Rio Padauiri. The<br />

colour description and painting of C. flavomaculata<br />

agree with C. temensis, and there is no similar<br />

species with black bars and horizontal rows of<br />

light spots in the area:<br />

“The body is greenish lake, with three black<br />

bars, three rows and several scattered yellow<br />

spots; on the head several black spots, and a<br />

peacock-eye on the insertion of the tail. Dorsal<br />

fin and upper part of tail, indigo spotted with<br />

light blue; ventral, anal, and lower half of caudal<br />

fin vermilion; pectoral greenish; gill-rays vermil-<br />

<strong>Kullander</strong> & Ferreira: Review of Cichla

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!