28.01.2013 Views

Open Access PDF - Sven Kullander

Open Access PDF - Sven Kullander

Open Access PDF - Sven Kullander

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

314<br />

material is 220 mm, but he figures a large adult,<br />

360 mm, with three distinct ocelli on the side, and<br />

lists a 617 mm specimen from the Sección de<br />

Osteologia del Aquarium Agustín Codazzi (no<br />

number, not listed in Machado-Allison, 1973: 158)<br />

in table 2. Machado-Allison (1973: 158) lists 6<br />

skeletal preparations 215-334 mm SL. Since the<br />

617 mm specimen is the only specimen in that<br />

paper stated to possess a continuous lateral line<br />

and an elevated number of lateral line scales (97,<br />

vs. upper + lower lateral line 73-88 recorded for<br />

other C. orinocensis in that paper), the identification<br />

is recorded here with reservation.<br />

Williams et al. (1998: 178) reported specimens<br />

up to 56.5 cm TL (corresponding to ca 46 cm SL)<br />

from the Guri reservoir, but their figure of size<br />

distributions (fig. 2) shows a specimen in the<br />

interval 65-70 cm TL. Winemiller (2001: 98) reported<br />

C. orinocensis up to 455 mm SL in rivers<br />

and 550 mm SL in reservoirs.<br />

Cichla orinocensis can be distinguished from<br />

all other Cichla species by the adult colour pattern,<br />

which typically includes three prominent black,<br />

ocellated blotches on the side, but no additional<br />

blotches on the dorsum (Fig. 15). The ocellated<br />

blotches develop gradually and directly from dark<br />

blotches along the midline of the side, and vary<br />

considerably in appearance in adults (Figs. 15-19).<br />

This variation is well covered by Román (1981),<br />

with illustrations of “typical” individuals with<br />

distinct ocelli (pp. 19, 27, 36, 49, 53, 70, 73, 105,<br />

113, 122, and 129), varying with respect to the<br />

background colour pattern, and both including<br />

specimens with golden or silvery specks on the<br />

black blotches and specimens with pure black<br />

blotches. An adult with an additional prominent<br />

ocellus between blotches 1 and 2 is illustrated by<br />

Román (1981: 74).<br />

Cichla orinocensis never shows black blotches<br />

posterior to the pectoral-fin base as in C. ocellaris,<br />

C. monoculus, C. kelberi, or C. pleiozona.<br />

Juvenile and young C. orinocensis up to 60-<br />

70 mm are similar to juvenile and young C. monoculus,<br />

C. kelberi and C. ocellaris in colour pattern.<br />

Both C. monoculus and C. orinocensis possess a<br />

wide, prominent dark band connecting the bar 3<br />

blotch and the caudal base blotch; in C. ocellaris<br />

this band is relatively more narrow and lighter.<br />

With increasing fish size, the caudal peduncle<br />

band disappears in all three species, but the bar<br />

3 blotch transforms differently: in C. orinocensis<br />

the bar 3 blotch (like the bar 1-2 blotches) develops<br />

into an ocellated midaxis blotch; in C. monocu-<br />

lus and C. kelberi lateral blotches are replaced by<br />

vertical bars which more intensely pigmented<br />

dorsally and the caudal peduncle band disappears;<br />

in C. ocellaris the bar 3 blotch remains as<br />

an irregular dark blotch unlike the bar 2 and 3<br />

blotches which are replaced by bars.<br />

Adults of the sympatric species C. temensis<br />

can be separated by scale counts (E1 scales 75-89<br />

in C. orinocensis vs. 98-128), absence of lateral<br />

ocelli, and postorbital markings wide vs. reduced<br />

to a few small blotches in C. orinocensis. Juveniles<br />

of C. temensis, in which scale counts are difficult<br />

to obtain, possess a continuous lateral band vs.<br />

distinct blotches 1 and 3, and a band caudad from<br />

blotch 3.<br />

Although C. orinocensis has a fairly wide distribution<br />

including two major drainage basins,<br />

there is no obvious geographical correlate in the<br />

variation in morphometric or meristic characters<br />

and the colour pattern variation cannot be organised<br />

geographically.<br />

A small specimen, MBUCV-V 10287, 82.3 mm<br />

SL, from the Venezuelan part of the Rio Cuyuni<br />

(Fig. 20), departs in colour pattern from young<br />

C. ocellaris, possessing an ocellated blotch 1, a<br />

large caudad tapering blotch 3, and the caudal<br />

blotch expanded onto the caudal peduncle. This<br />

colour pattern agrees with that illustrated by<br />

Eigenmann (1912, pl. 69 fig. 2) of a 138 mm<br />

specimen from Gluck Island in the Essequibo<br />

River identified by Eigenmann as C. ocellaris.<br />

Eigenmann’s other figures of a juvenile and two<br />

adults of Guyanan C. ocellaris are compatible with<br />

C. ocellaris as illustrated in this paper and in <strong>Kullander</strong><br />

& Nijssen (1989). The Cuyuni specimen<br />

has 80 scales in the E1 row and lateral line sinistrally<br />

discontinuous, dextrally continuous. Measurements<br />

fall outside C. ocellaris in morphometric<br />

PCA analyses. The colour pattern is more similar<br />

to that of small C. orinocensis (cf. Fig. 13), although<br />

the blotches may be considered large also for that<br />

species. A photograph of a large adult Cichla<br />

specimen, MCNG 16565, 225 mm SL, from the<br />

Rio Cuyuni (specimen not examined; photograph<br />

reproduced by Winemiller, 2001: fig. 1, right<br />

center, as C. ocellaris), shows a specimen very<br />

similar to a large specimen of C. orinocensis from<br />

the Rio Caroní (Fig. 18). It is thus possible that a<br />

population of C. orinocensis inhabits the upper Rio<br />

Cuyuni and the possible presence of this species<br />

in the Essequibo River drainage, suggested by<br />

Eigenmann’s figure, should be investigated further.<br />

<strong>Kullander</strong> & Ferreira: Review of Cichla

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!