Calcul des etats atteignables de programmes Esterel partitionne ...
Calcul des etats atteignables de programmes Esterel partitionne ...
Calcul des etats atteignables de programmes Esterel partitionne ...
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
BIBLIOGRAPHY 95[30] Olivier Cou<strong>de</strong>rt. SIAM : Une Boite à Outils Pour la Preuve Formelle <strong>de</strong> SystèmesSéquentiels. PhD thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure <strong><strong>de</strong>s</strong> Télécommunications, Octobre1991.[31] Olivier Cou<strong>de</strong>rt, Jean-Christophe Madre, and Hervé Touati. TiGeR Version 1.0 UserGui<strong>de</strong>. Digital Paris Research Lab, December 1993.[32] David L. Dill. The Murϕ Verification System. In Proceedings of the 8th InternationalConference on Computer Ai<strong>de</strong>d Verification, CAV’96, volume 1102 of Lecture Notes inComputer Science, pages 390–393. Springer Verlag, July 1996.[33] Stephen A. Edwards, Tony Ma, and Robert Damiano. Using a hardware mo<strong>de</strong>l checker toverify software. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on ASIC (ASICON)(2001). IEEE Press, 2001.[34] Xavier Fornari. Optimisation du contrôle et implantation en circuits <strong>de</strong> <strong>programmes</strong> <strong>Esterel</strong>.PhD thesis, Ecole <strong><strong>de</strong>s</strong> Mines <strong>de</strong> Paris, CMA, Sophia Antipolis, France, March 1995.[35] D. Geist and I. Beer. Efficient mo<strong>de</strong>l checking by automated or<strong>de</strong>ring of transition relationpartitions. In Proc. 6th International Computer Ai<strong>de</strong>d Verification Conference, volume818, pages 299–310, 1994.[36] Georges Gonthier. Sémantique et modèles d’exécution <strong><strong>de</strong>s</strong> langages réactifs synchrones :application à <strong>Esterel</strong>. PhD thesis, Université d’Orsay, Paris, France, March 1988.[37] Shankar G. Govindaraju and David L. Dill. Verification by approximate forward andbackward reachability. In International Conference on Computer Ai<strong>de</strong>d Design (ICCAD-98), pages 366–370, N. Y., November 8–12 1998. ACM Press.[38] Shankar G. Govindaraju, David L. Dill, Alan J. Hu, and Mark A. Horowitz. Approximatereachability with BDDs using overlapping projections. In Proceedings of the 1998 Conferenceon Design Automation (DAC-98), pages 451–456, Los Alamitos, CA, June 15–191998. ACM/IEEE.[39] N. Halbwachs, P. Caspi, P. Raymond, and D. Pilaud. The synchronous dataflow programminglanguage lustre. In Proceedings of the IEEE, volume 79(9), pages 1305–1320, 1991.[40] Nicolas Halbwachs. Synchronous Programming of Reactive Systems. Kluwer Aca<strong>de</strong>micPublishers, 1993.[41] D. Harel and A. Pnueli. On the <strong>de</strong>velopment of reactive systems. Logics and mo<strong>de</strong>ls ofconcurrent systems, pages 477–498, 1985.[42] David Harel. Statecharts : A visual formalism for complex systems. Science of ComputerProgramming, 8, 1987.[43] Hiroyuki Higuchi and Fabio Somenzi. Lazy group sifting for efficient symbolic state traversalof FSMs. In International Conference on Computer-Ai<strong>de</strong>d Design (ICCAD ’99), pages 45–49, Washington - Brussels - Tokyo, November 1999. IEEE.[44] Youpyo Hong, Peter A. Beerel, Jerry R. Burch, and Kenneth L. McMillan. Safe BDD minimizationusing don’t cares. In Proceedings of the 34th Conference on Design Automation(DAC-97), pages 208–213, NY, June 9–13 1997. ACM Press.[45] A. J. Hu, D. L. Dill, A. J. Drexler, and C. H. Yang. Higher-level specification and verificationwith BDDs. In Proc. 4th International Computer Ai<strong>de</strong>d Verification Conference, pages 82–95, 1992.[46] Alan J. Hu and David L. Dill. Efficient verification with BDDs using implicitly conjoinedinvariants. In Computer Ai<strong>de</strong>d Verification, pages 3–14, 1993.