12.07.2015 Views

Visão de Biodiversidade da Ecorregião Serra do Mar

Visão de Biodiversidade da Ecorregião Serra do Mar

Visão de Biodiversidade da Ecorregião Serra do Mar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Visão <strong>de</strong> Biodiversi<strong>da</strong><strong>de</strong> <strong>da</strong> Ecorregião <strong>Serra</strong> <strong>do</strong> <strong>Mar</strong>113OLIVIERI, S. et al. A participatory approach to biodiversity conservation: the regionalpriority setting workshop. Washington: Conservation International, 1995.OMERNIK, J. M. Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States. In: Annals of the AmericanGeographers. v. 77, n. 1. [S.l: s.n], 1987. p. 118-125______. Ecoregions: A Spatial Framework for Environmental Management. In: DAVIS, W.;SIMON, T. (Ed.). Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planningand Decision Making. Flori<strong>da</strong>: Lewis Publishers, 1995. p. 49-62.OLSON, D. M.; et al. Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth.BioScience, v. 51, n. 11, p. 933-938, nov. 2000.PEREIRA, R. S. Desktop GARP – user’s manual. [S.l: s.n], 2003. Disponível em: . Acesso em jan. 2007.PERNAMBUCO (Esta<strong>do</strong>). Secretaria <strong>de</strong> ciência, tecnologia e meio ambiente. Atlas <strong>da</strong>biodiversi<strong>da</strong><strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong> Pernambuco. Pernambuco, 2002. 86p.PIERCE, et al. Systematic conservation planning products for land-use planning:interpretation for implementation. Biological conservation,v. 125, p. 441-458, 2005.POR, F. V. Sooretama: The Atlantic Rain Forest of Brazil. San Diego: SPB Aca<strong>de</strong>micPublishing, 1992. 130 p.POSSINGHAM, H. P.; et al. Mathematical methods for i<strong>de</strong>ntifying representative reservenetworks. In: FERSON, S.; BURGMAN, M. (Ed.) Quantitative methods for conservationbiology. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2000, p. 291-305.PRESSEY, R. L., et al. Sha<strong>de</strong>s of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution ofsites to a reservation goal. Biodiversity and Conservation, v. 3, p. 242-262, 1994.______; LOGAN, V.S. Size of selection units for future reserves and its influence onactual vs targeted representation of features: a case study in western New South Wales.Biological Conservation, [S.l: s.n], v.85, p. 305-319, 1998.______. Algorithms, politics, and timber: an example of the role of science in a publicpolitical negotiation process over new conservation areas in production forests. In: WILLS,R. T.; HOBBS R. J. (ed.). Ecology for Everyone: Communicating Ecology to Scientists, thePublic and the Politicians. Sidney: Surrey Beaty & Sons, 1998. p. 73-87.______; et al. Using abiotic <strong>da</strong>ta for conservation assessments over extensive regions:quantitative methods applied across New South Wales, Australia. Biological Conservation,v. 96, p. 55-82, 2000.______; TAFFS, K.H. Scheduling conservation action in production landscapes: priorityareas in western New South Wales <strong>de</strong>fined by irreplaceability and vulnerability tovegetation loss. Biological Conservation, v.100, p. 355-376, 2001.______; et al. User Manual of C-Plan conservation planning software. Queensland: NSWDepartment of Environment and Conservation - University of Queensland, 2005.UNIR PARA CONSERVAR A VIDA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!