30.07.2013 Views

Serviceeftersyn af vilkårene for kulbrinteudvinding ... - Skatteministeriet

Serviceeftersyn af vilkårene for kulbrinteudvinding ... - Skatteministeriet

Serviceeftersyn af vilkårene for kulbrinteudvinding ... - Skatteministeriet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fiscal Comparison/Exploration Attractiveness<br />

Exploration activity 2002 – 2011<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Exploration Wells Drilled<br />

Netherlands UK Norw ay Denmark<br />

Source Wood M ackenzie<br />

Exploration results comparison<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

Exploration Success Rate (%)<br />

Netherlands UK Norw ay Denmark<br />

Source Wood M ackenzie<br />

9,000<br />

8,000<br />

7,000<br />

6,000<br />

5,000<br />

4,000<br />

3,000<br />

2,000<br />

1,000<br />

0<br />

Discovered Volume (mmboe)<br />

Netherlands UK Norw ay Denmark<br />

Source Wood M ackenzie<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Average Discovery Size (mmboe)<br />

Netherlands UK Norw ay Denmark<br />

Source Wood M ackenzie<br />

All countries reviewed except Denmark have created value through exploration in the last decade. Exploration<br />

investment has generally corresponded to this trend, with Denmark having the lowest total exploration expenditure over<br />

the past decade. Drilling activity in the UK and Norway are driven by the large number of players and, in Norway<br />

specifically, direct incentives <strong>for</strong> non-tax paying companies to obtain a tax refund on exploration costs.<br />

Page 10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!