California's Ocean Economy - California Resources Agency - State ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

NOEP 3.1 Overview of Activities: Fisheries Landings and Values The US fishing industry has undergone massive changes during the past 25 years, but overall, landings have remained relatively steady at about 10 billion pounds a year and GSP at about $3.5 billion annually. In 1991 and 1994, the total US landings reached a peak, with more than 10 billion pounds in total landings each year (Figure 3-2). However, the overall national appearance is deceptive. Some states have increased their take with new species and others have seen their fisheries almost collapse. In California, the fisheries landings have shown the largest decline throughout the last 25 years, with the largest dip in the most recent years, showing a decrease from billions to millions in a 20-year time frame. Each of the five regions in California showed a decrease in landings, with an increase in value. This was not true for the Central Coast, which showed an increase in both landings and value. The Central Coast includes Monterey County, Santa Cruz County, and San Mateo County. In California, there is also concern about other competitive uses of the land and water, other than for fisheries. As tourism continues to grow, it needs space, sometimes outcompeting fisheries for limited dock and shoreline space. These changes have had major impacts on California’s economy (Figure 3-2). Although we usually use 2000 as our latest benchmark, we have included figures representing the years after 2000 because these numbers were readily available and told an even more complete story. Figure 3-3 reflects some of these losses. • Between 1982 and 1999, California’s fishing fleet declined by an estimated 4000 vessels, from approximately 6700 to 2700 boats. • In 1976, California’s fleet landed a peak of 1.3 billion pounds of fish and invertebrates, compared to landings of 650 million pounds in 2000. • In 1980, the California fleet, at a peak since 1970, brought in more than $300 million in landed value, compared to $142 million in 2000 and $91 million in 2002 (NMFS) (See Figure 3-3). California’s share of the US total commercial landings fell from approximately 19% in 1970 to about 7.1% of the US total, and 3.9% of total landed value in 2000 (See Figure 3-4). • 1970 to 1990, total finfish and shellfish landings in California declined by more than half, while total US landings almost doubled. California experienced a dramatic drop in landings of tuna, ground fish, urchin, shark, swordfish, salmon, and abalone. 19 19 (NMFS site and www.OceanEconomics.org, which uses the data from that site) 34
NOEP Billion Pounds 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 U.S. Total Commercial Fishery Landings and Values Figure 3-2: US Total Commercial Fishery Landings and Values Source: Pacific Coast Fisheries Information Network (Pacfin) 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 US Total Landings in Billion Pounds US Total Value in $Billion 35 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 US $Billion
Page 1 and 2: NOEP CALIFORNIA’S OCEAN ECONOMY R
Page 3 and 4: NOEP Table of Contents Executive Su
Page 5 and 6: NOEP PART IV APPENDIX .............
Page 7 and 8: NOEP Table 6-4: 2000 Employment, Wa
Page 9 and 10: NOEP Figure 8-4: Fishing and Boatin
Page 11 and 12: NOEP Executive Summary California
Page 13 and 14: NOEP Acknowledgements The State of
Page 15 and 16: NOEP PART I BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY
Page 17 and 18: NOEP ocean and economic activity, s
Page 19 and 20: NOEP The use of SIC codes and geogr
Page 21 and 22: NOEP Chapter 2 Summary of Findings
Page 23 and 24: NOEP Table 2-2: Regional Population
Page 25 and 26: NOEP Table 2-5: Growth Rates for Co
Page 27 and 28: NOEP 2.4 California’s Ocean Econo
Page 29 and 30: NOEP 2.5 California’s Ocean Econo
Page 31 and 32: NOEP Table 2-10: California Ocean E
Page 33 and 34: NOEP Figure 2-5 shows that the prop
Page 35 and 36: NOEP Number of Workers 1,000,000 10
Page 37 and 38: NOEP 2.7 Indirect and Induced Estim
Page 39 and 40: NOEP • Construction trends in mar
Page 41 and 42: NOEP PART II THE SECTORS OF THE CAL
Page 43: NOEP assess: a) Landings and landed
Page 47 and 48: NOEP Percentage 25% 20% 15% 10% 5%
Page 49 and 50: NOEP in terms of revenue, replacing
Page 51 and 52: NOEP Figure 3-6 shows the landings
Page 53 and 54: NOEP Thousands of Wet Tons 200 180
Page 55 and 56: NOEP 3.4 Conclusion Living Resource
Page 57 and 58: NOEP Chapter 4 California Ocean Min
Page 59 and 60: NOEP Table 4-3: California Offshore
Page 61 and 62: NOEP Table 4-6: Coastal Counties On
Page 63 and 64: NOEP are concentrated in less than
Page 65 and 66: NOEP Chapter 5 California Marine Tr
Page 67 and 68: NOEP million tons of foreign cargo
Page 69 and 70: NOEP 120,000,000 100,000,000 80,000
Page 71 and 72: NOEP From 1992 to 2001, total value
Page 73 and 74: NOEP Table 5-4: Port Rankings 2001
Page 75 and 76: NOEP 5.2 CA Water Transportation: R
Page 77 and 78: NOEP Table 5-9: Warehousing (SIC co
Page 79 and 80: NOEP Table 5-11: Marine Passenger T
Page 81 and 82: NOEP Table 5-13: Search and Navigat
Page 83 and 84: NOEP 5.2 References California Mari
Page 85 and 86: NOEP Chapter 6 California Marine Co
Page 87 and 88: NOEP 6.2.1 Historical Capital Expen
Page 89 and 90: NOEP 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0%
Page 91 and 92: NOEP CA Share of Total U.S. Port Ca
Page 93 and 94: NOEP 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 US Po
Page 95 and 96:
NOEP 6.2.2 Proposed Capital Expendi
Page 97 and 98:
NOEP 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0
Page 99 and 100:
NOEP CA Share of Capital Expenditur
Page 101 and 102:
NOEP 6.2.4 Economic Impact The foll
Page 103 and 104:
NOEP 6.3 Beach Nourishment 39 In Ca
Page 105 and 106:
NOEP Table 6-6: Funding for Califor
Page 107 and 108:
NOEP Chapter 7: California Ship & B
Page 109 and 110:
NOEP research ships for commercial
Page 111 and 112:
NOEP 7.3 References CA Employment D
Page 113 and 114:
NOEP Chapter 8 Coastal Tourism & Re
Page 115 and 116:
NOEP volume and diversity, along th
Page 117 and 118:
NOEP participated in marine recreat
Page 119 and 120:
NOEP 8.2.2 California Beach Valuati
Page 121 and 122:
NOEP No attempt has been made to es
Page 123 and 124:
NOEP 8.2.3 Recreational Fishing and
Page 125 and 126:
NOEP 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,0
Page 127 and 128:
NOEP The travel industry supported
Page 129 and 130:
NOEP 8.4 Regional Estimates of Cali
Page 131 and 132:
NOEP Table 8-16 Cont. SIC4 Region N
Page 133 and 134:
NOEP Table 8-17 summarizes the tota
Page 135 and 136:
NOEP 8.5 References California Fast
Page 137 and 138:
NOEP PART III CONCLUSION Future Dir
Page 139 and 140:
NOEP PART IV APPENDIX Appendix A: T
Page 141 and 142:
NOEP All ES-202 data are reported t
Page 143 and 144:
NOEP At the same time, this data se
Page 145 and 146:
NOEP fishing, or boating will not o
Page 147 and 148:
NOEP Table B-1: Commercial Fisherie
Page 149 and 150:
NOEP Appendix C: California Marine
Page 151 and 152:
NOEP Appendix D: California Beaches
Page 153 and 154:
NOEP Table D-1: Regional Beaches an
Page 155 and 156:
NOEP Table D-1: Regional Beaches an
Page 157 and 158:
NOEP Table D-2: Regional Beaches fr
Page 159 and 160:
NOEP Table D-2: Regional Beaches fr
Page 161 and 162:
NOEP Region County Beach Gray Whale
Page 163 and 164:
NOEP Region County Beach San Luis O
Page 165 and 166:
NOEP Region County Beach La Piedra
show all

California's Ocean Economy - California Resources Agency - State ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?