24.02.2013 Views

8th INTERNATIONAL WHEAT CONFERENCE

8th INTERNATIONAL WHEAT CONFERENCE

8th INTERNATIONAL WHEAT CONFERENCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

STRATegIeS foR ImPRoVINg WheAT ReSISTANCe<br />

To NeCRoTRoPhIC dISeASeS<br />

Robert Loughman 1 , Manisha Shankar 1 , Michael<br />

Francki 1 , Robin Wilson 2 and Richard Oliver 3<br />

1 Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, 3 Baron-Hay Court, South Perth<br />

6151 Australia; 2 InterGrain Pty Ltd, PO Box 4100 Victoria Park, 6100; 3 Curtin University<br />

of Technology, GPO Box U1987 Perth, Western Australia 6845.<br />

robert.loughman@agric.wa.gov.au<br />

Foliar necrotrophic diseases such as tan spot (TS) caused by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis<br />

(Died.) Drechs. and stagonospora nodorum blotch (SNB) caused by Phaeosphaeria nodorum<br />

(E. Müller) Hedjaroude present resistance breeding targets in Australia as in many<br />

other wheat growing regions. Stubble retention farming optimised with efficient chemical<br />

weed control has favoured these leaf diseases which affect both yield and quality through<br />

the production of shrivelled and poor coloured grain. The two pathogens are sufficiently<br />

similar in their ecology to frequently occur together as a disease complex. Improving resistance<br />

to necrotrophic diseases remains a challenging area in wheat breeding hampered<br />

by both the quantitative control and partial expression of resistance. Phenotypic selection<br />

is frequently laborious and significantly influenced by plant growth stage and environment.<br />

Improving disease resistance is compromised by the need to achieve gains in other<br />

breeding objectives.<br />

Resistance to both pathogens is partial, generally expressed as restricted or slower lesion<br />

development. There has been some success in sourcing SNB resistance for breeding<br />

winter wheat germplasm. Resistance to SNB in white-grained spring wheats has been<br />

more problematic due to grain softness, low flour yield and high α-amylase activity. For<br />

TS, resistance expression in bread wheat sources has been less problematic. Surveillance<br />

outside the adapted primary gene pools, including synthetic bread wheats and wheat<br />

relatives, has also confirmed the reliance on partial resistance for both diseases. Effective<br />

resistance sources in this context are a balance between the expression of resistance,<br />

frequency in adapted gene pools, behaviour in breeding and association of penalties<br />

through linkage drag.<br />

Genetic studies have broadly focused on the inheritance of resistance in i) adapted germplasm,<br />

ii) germplasm potentially contributing resistance effects through gene diversity<br />

and iii) where genetic materials differentiate host response to specific fungal products as<br />

qualitative responses corresponding to quantitative trait loci for disease response to the<br />

pathogen. An international focus on these two necrotrophs has advanced a considerable<br />

understanding of the underlying mechanism of disease determined by multiple proteinaceous<br />

host-specific toxins (HSTs) that act in an inverse gene-for-gene manner. This international<br />

research effort has characterised at least five S. nodorum HSTs as necrotrophic<br />

effectors and three P. tritici-repentis effectors that interact with specific host sensitivity<br />

204

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!