24.02.2013 Views

8th INTERNATIONAL WHEAT CONFERENCE

8th INTERNATIONAL WHEAT CONFERENCE

8th INTERNATIONAL WHEAT CONFERENCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PoPuLATIoN STRuCTuRe IN A CoRe CoLLeCTIoN<br />

of WheAT ANd ASSoCIATIoN STudy oN A gRAIN yIeLd<br />

uNdeR dIffeReNT WATeR RegImeS<br />

Dejan Dodig 1 , Miroslav Zorić 2 , Borislav Kobiljski 3 ,<br />

Vesna Kandić 1<br />

1 Maize Research Institute, ‘Zemun Polje’, Slobodana Bajica 1, 11185 Belgrade, Serbia<br />

2 Faculty of Technology, University of Novi Sad, Bulevar Cara Lazara 1, 21000 Novi Sad,<br />

Serbia<br />

3 Research Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Maksima Gorkog 30, 21000 Novi Sad,<br />

Serbia<br />

E-mail Address of presenting author: dejanza@yahoo.com<br />

Understanding of genetic diversity, population structure, and molecular relatedness is<br />

important for breeding, germplasm improvement, and association studies. A set of 96<br />

common wheat genotypes of worldwide origin, including cultivars and breeding lines,<br />

were characterized with 46 genome-wide SSR loci for genetic diversity and population<br />

structure. Genetic diversity among these genotypes was examined using a genetic distance-based<br />

and a model-based clustering methods. The model-based analysis identified<br />

an underlying population structure, consisting of four main distinct subpopulations for<br />

the whole genotype set, corresponding well to four major distance-based groups. Among<br />

all of the genotypes, 58.3% were assigned into the corresponding subgroups, while others<br />

were assigned into a mixed subpopulation. Partial least squares (PLS) regression method,<br />

with nine environmental explanatory variables for interpreting genotype × environment<br />

interaction for grain yield, also suggested that our germplasm collection does not represent<br />

a single unstructured Hardy-Weinberger population. Analysis of molecular variance<br />

(AMOVA) showed that 87.6% of the total variation could be explained by the variance<br />

within the subpopulation groups. The effect of population structure on association mapping<br />

was tested on three-year data of grain yield under irrigated, rainfed and drought<br />

stress conditions. A total of 21 marker-grain yield associations (P < 0.01) were identified<br />

with nine different SSR markers. Most associations were detected only in one to three<br />

environments (year-treatment combinations) with an average R 2 value around 13%. Nevertheless,<br />

marker gwm484 was associated with six environments, including irrigated,<br />

rainfed and drought stress treatments, with R 2 values ranging from 23 to 36%. Microsatellite<br />

marker gwm484 (on chromosome 2D) may be useful for marker assisted selection to<br />

enhance yield under both non-stress and drought stress conditions. The results improved<br />

our characterization of the germplasm used and will assist the selection of new crosses<br />

for drought stress conditions.<br />

Key Words: Associating mapping, population structure, water-stress, wheat, yield<br />

434

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!