24.02.2013 Views

8th INTERNATIONAL WHEAT CONFERENCE

8th INTERNATIONAL WHEAT CONFERENCE

8th INTERNATIONAL WHEAT CONFERENCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

yIeLd gAPS, SoIL INdIgeNouS NuTRIeNT SuPPLy, ANd<br />

NuTRIeNT uSe effICIeNCy of WheAT IN ChINA<br />

Ping HE<br />

China Program, International Plant Nutrition Institute(IPNI) and Institute of Agricultural<br />

resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 12 South<br />

Zhongguancun Street, Beijing, 100081, China.<br />

E-mail Address of presenting author: phe@ipni.net<br />

Before any improvements on crop management practices have been made, it is of great<br />

importance to know the the attainable yield (Ya) of the crop in the region, and the yield gap<br />

between Ya and the actual yield obtained by the growers. Analysis of the soil indigenous<br />

nutrient supply and nutrient use efficiency of wheat will help to bridge the yield gap due<br />

imbalance nutrient management. Based on the data of field experiments in different wheat<br />

growing-regions and a number of data published in the literatures from 1995 to 2008, the<br />

yield gaps, soil indigenous nutrient supplies, and nutrient use efficiency of wheat in China<br />

were analyzed. The attainable yield (Ya) in this study was proposed to the weather limited<br />

yields that can be achieved with current best manage practices. The actual yield in farmer’s<br />

fields always lower than (Ya) due to inefficient use of fertilizer nutrient. Average Ya of wheat<br />

grown in the whole China was 6695 kg ha –1 . There were significant differences of Ya among<br />

different regions in China. The Ya obtained followed the order of North-central China (7129<br />

kg ha –1 )> the Lower reaches of the Yangtze River (7023 kg ha –1 )> Northwest China (5089<br />

kg ha –1 )>Southwest China (5023 kg ha –1 ) >Northwest China (3480 kg ha –1 ). The yield gap<br />

between Ya and the actual yield obtained by the farmers (YFP) was averagely 870 kg ha –1<br />

across field types and localities, which was about 13% of Ya. The yield gap between Ya and the<br />

actual yield due to no fertilizer supply was wider, averaged by 2515 kg ha –1 , and ranged from<br />

171 kg ha –1 to 5552 kg ha –1 , which was about 33% of Ya. The average yield gap-N (due to no N<br />

supply) was 1928.3 kg ha –1 , ranged 974–3240 kg ha –1 accounting for 50% of all the cases. The<br />

average yield gap-N was about 29% of Ya. The average yield gap-P (due to no P supply) was<br />

989 kg ha –1 , ranged 475.4 –1 272.0 kg ha –1 accounting for 50% of all the cases. The average yield<br />

gap-P was about 14.8% of Ya. The average yield gap-K (due to no K supply) was 923.4 kg ha –1 ,<br />

ranged 440.6 –1 330.2 kg ha –1 account for 50% of all the cases. The average yield gap-K was about<br />

13.8% of Ya. Yield gap caused by no nutrient supply was following the order of N>P>K.<br />

The amount of N derived from indigenous resources varied from 37.8 to 275.2 kg N ha –1 ,<br />

and averaged by 120.9 kg N ha –1 . The amount of P derived from indigenous resources ranged<br />

6.4–59.8 kg P ha –1 , and averaged by 27.4 kg P ha –1 . The amount of K derived from indigenous<br />

resources wheat ranged from 36.9–357.0 kg K ha –1 , and averaged by 133.0 kg K ha –1 .<br />

Apparent recovery efficiency (RE) of N, P and K were 38 % (n=333), 17 % (n=99) and 30 %<br />

(n=120) respectively. RE of N, P and K decreased by 7, 5 and 17 percentage point than that<br />

in 1985-1995, respectively. The agronomy efficiency (AE) of N, P and K in optimal nutrient<br />

management practices were 10.6 (n=559), 22.3 (n=294) and 9.2 (n=593) kg kg<br />

45<br />

-1 , respectively.<br />

The most commonly distributed (from 25% to 75%) AE values ranged from 5.2–14.9 kg kg-1 for N, 10.7–29.4 kg kg-1 for P and 4.5–11.9 kg kg-1for K for wheat in China.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!