25.02.2013 Views

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

116<br />

<strong>Freedom</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sword</strong>: The U.S. Colored Troops, 1862–1867<br />

to qualifications.” Colonels of white regiments had used <strong>the</strong> Corps d’Afrique<br />

as a dumping ground for knaves and incompetents. Men concerned only with<br />

promotion found <strong>the</strong> new organizations a convenient means of jumping a grade<br />

or two. 71<br />

Unfortunately for <strong>the</strong> 4th Corps d’Afrique Infantry, some of its officers<br />

were just <strong>the</strong> sort of men General Banks deplored. One evening in January<br />

1864, four of <strong>the</strong>m, including <strong>the</strong> officer of <strong>the</strong> day and <strong>the</strong> officer of <strong>the</strong> guard,<br />

set out to inspect <strong>the</strong> quarters of <strong>the</strong> company laundresses near Fort Jackson.<br />

Every company was entitled to four laundresses, whose rations, quarters, and<br />

fuel <strong>the</strong> <strong>Army</strong> provided. Their wages came from <strong>the</strong> washing <strong>the</strong>y did, at rates<br />

determined <strong>by</strong> a council of officers. It was a choice job for an enlisted man’s<br />

wife, and most laundresses had no trouble finding a husband. On <strong>the</strong> night in<br />

question, <strong>the</strong> inspecting officers began <strong>by</strong> making an indecent proposal to one<br />

laundress, who flung <strong>the</strong> contents of a chamber pot in <strong>the</strong>ir direction. They left<br />

Capt. William H. Knapp at <strong>the</strong> next woman’s cabin, where he had arranged to<br />

spend <strong>the</strong> night. Two of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r officers <strong>the</strong>n threatened women who washed<br />

for <strong>the</strong>ir companies with loss of employment if <strong>the</strong>y did not acquiesce to <strong>the</strong><br />

same arrangement Captain Knapp had made with his laundress. One of <strong>the</strong><br />

women told an investigator “that <strong>the</strong>n ‘Charley Goff,’ referring to Captain<br />

[Charles A.] Goff, got on her bed, while Lt [William H.] Odell held her, and<br />

she does not know what would have resulted, had not her vigorous cries caused<br />

<strong>the</strong> inspectors to quit her premises. This <strong>the</strong>y did, stating to her that she was<br />

a bitch, whereat she suggested that <strong>the</strong>y must have descended from a similar<br />

animal.” The investigator also collected testimony from four enlisted men of<br />

<strong>the</strong> 4th Corps d’Afrique Infantry, as well as from <strong>the</strong> women who washed<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir clo<strong>the</strong>s, “that scenes similar to this one . . . have been of frequent, almost<br />

nightly occurrence for a long time past; that o<strong>the</strong>r officers than those arrested<br />

have been at o<strong>the</strong>r times equally guilty. So that <strong>the</strong> names of many officers have<br />

long been held up to <strong>the</strong> scandal and contempt of <strong>the</strong> soldiers of <strong>the</strong> Regiment.”<br />

General Dwight recommended immediate dishonorable discharges for <strong>the</strong> officers<br />

in order to avoid <strong>the</strong> necessity of public testimony <strong>by</strong> “negro women of<br />

more than questionable character” and <strong>by</strong> enlisted men who knew <strong>the</strong>y would<br />

suffer if <strong>the</strong> officers were acquitted. The men’s expectations of <strong>the</strong> officers’<br />

acquittal were justified, for <strong>the</strong> president revoked <strong>the</strong> dismissals and <strong>the</strong>y all returned<br />

to <strong>the</strong> regiment, two of <strong>the</strong>m serving with it through <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> war. 72<br />

Despite difficulties with <strong>the</strong> quality of officers and enlisted men, <strong>the</strong> Corps<br />

d’Afrique grew. In late May, Ullmann had brought parts of five regiments numbering<br />

1,400 men to <strong>the</strong> siege of Port Hudson. By mid-August, seventeen infantry<br />

regiments reported a total of 8,107 men. A battery of light artillery and<br />

a company of cavalry were organizing. Three companies of heavy artillery<br />

71 OR, ser. 1, vol. 26, pt. 1, p. 458.<br />

72 Brig Gen W. Dwight to Brig Gen C. P. Stone, 27 Jan 1864 (quotations); AGO, SO 190, 28<br />

May 1864; both in 76th <strong>US</strong>CI, Entry 57C, RG 94, NA. ORVF, 8: 252; August V. Kautz, Customs of<br />

Service for Non-Commissioned <strong>Of</strong>ficers and Soldiers (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1865), pp. 12–<br />

13; Edward M. Coffman, The Old <strong>Army</strong>: A Portrait of <strong>the</strong> American <strong>Army</strong> in Peacetime, 1784–1898<br />

(New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), pp. 112–13.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!