25.02.2013 Views

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

488<br />

<strong>Freedom</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sword</strong>: The U.S. Colored Troops, 1862–1867<br />

strongly threatened, and . . . <strong>the</strong> troops would all be killed . . . if I sent <strong>the</strong>m out<br />

to make any arrest. There are but 13 of <strong>the</strong>m not enough to enforce respect to <strong>the</strong><br />

authority of <strong>the</strong> U.S. nor defend <strong>the</strong>mselves if <strong>the</strong> conflict comes. . . . Ei<strong>the</strong>r white<br />

troops should be sent here or enough colored ones to enable <strong>the</strong>m to enforce order<br />

& protect <strong>the</strong>mselves.” 70<br />

The effectiveness of <strong>the</strong> occupying force continued to decline through <strong>the</strong><br />

winter. Freedmen’s Bureau agents in Kentucky and Arkansas needed military<br />

escorts to make arrests for murder and <strong>the</strong>ft, and could not get <strong>the</strong>m. Where<br />

black infantry regiments were available, officers had requests of <strong>the</strong>ir own.<br />

Post commanders at Grenada, Mississippi, and Baton Rouge asked for horses<br />

enough to mount a few infantrymen. Without an escort, <strong>the</strong> commanding officer<br />

of <strong>the</strong> 84th <strong>US</strong>CI explained, it was dangerous for a federal official to travel<br />

more than eight or ten miles outside <strong>the</strong> state capital of Louisiana. The Bureau’s<br />

assistant commissioner for Arkansas asked <strong>the</strong> department commander<br />

to send a company of cavalry to Hamburg, which he said was “controlled <strong>by</strong><br />

unsubdued rebels.” In <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn part of <strong>the</strong> state, an officer and two enlisted<br />

men of <strong>the</strong> 113th <strong>US</strong>CI, <strong>the</strong> only mounted force available, tried to arrest a man<br />

for assaulting a Bureau agent. They followed <strong>the</strong> assailant to his home, where<br />

he shot at <strong>the</strong>m and, since his three pursuers were not enough to cover all sides<br />

of <strong>the</strong> house, rode off in <strong>the</strong> night. The Bureau agent at Duvall’s Bluff, an officer<br />

of <strong>the</strong> same regiment, concluded that it was “almost impossible . . . to<br />

enforce <strong>the</strong> regulations of <strong>the</strong> Bureau without troops.” Never<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> War<br />

Department continued to disband <strong>the</strong> volunteer force. Forty-one more black<br />

regiments mustered out during <strong>the</strong> winter. 71<br />

Events in Georgia during <strong>the</strong> first postwar fall and winter illustrate <strong>the</strong> sort<br />

of relations that prevailed between white planters, black farmworkers, defiant<br />

former Confederates, Freedmen’s Bureau agents, and soldiers in <strong>the</strong> everdwindling<br />

occupation force. Maj. William Gray of <strong>the</strong> 1st <strong>US</strong>CA was a Bureau<br />

inspector in <strong>the</strong> state. In counties northwest of Augusta, he found:<br />

Many of <strong>the</strong> farmers have not yet settled with, and say <strong>the</strong>y do not intend to pay,<br />

<strong>the</strong> freed people for <strong>the</strong>ir last year’s work. The ignorance of <strong>the</strong> freed people<br />

has been taken advantage of . . . , and many of <strong>the</strong> white people have coerced<br />

<strong>the</strong>m into making contracts at from $2 to $4 and $6 per month—stating that, if<br />

<strong>the</strong>y did not . . . go to work after New Year, <strong>the</strong>y would all be taken away, sent<br />

70 Brig Gen J. C. Beecher to Lt M. N. Rice, 9 Jan 1866 (f/w D–26), NA M752, roll 20; Maj Gen<br />

C. B. Fisk to Maj Gen O. O. Howard, 30 Apr 1866 (F–30–MDT–1866) (“could do”), Entry 926, pt. 1,<br />

RG 393, NA; Capt E. G. Barker to Brig Gen J. W. Sprague, 28 Apr 1866 (S–66–DA–1866) (“troops<br />

sufficient”), and A. W. Ballard to Col D. H. Williams, 30 Apr 1866 (B–10 [Sup] DA–1866) (“The<br />

most”), Entry 269, pt. 1, RG 393, NA.<br />

71 2d Lt R. W. Thing to 2d Lt J. T. Alden, 8 Jan 1866 (T–121), NA T142, roll 27; W. G. Bond to<br />

Maj Gen C. B. Fisk, 23 Jan 1866 (B–26), NA T142, roll 28; Maj E. Boedicker to 1st Lt J. K. Wood,<br />

12 Jan 1866 (B–26–DL–1866), Entry 1757, pt. 1, RG 393, NA; Capt S. Marvin to Col M. P. Bestow,<br />

10 Feb 1866 (S–25–DM–1866), Entry 2433, pt. 1, RG 393, NA; Brig Gen J. W. Sprague to Maj Gen<br />

J. J. Reynolds, 17 Jan 1866 (“controlled <strong>by</strong>”), NA M979, roll 1; Capt E. P. Gillpatrick to Maj J. M.<br />

Bowler, 16 Jan 1866, NA M979, roll 6; 1st Lt W. S. McCullough to Capt D. H. Williams, 31 Jan 1866<br />

(“almost impossible”), NA M979, roll 23.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!