25.02.2013 Views

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

54<br />

<strong>Freedom</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sword</strong>: The U.S. Colored Troops, 1862–1867<br />

Wagner, which was still under bombardment <strong>by</strong> federal guns, was too “warm<br />

[a] spot for a court to sit.” 72<br />

What really happened was different. The court tried only four of <strong>the</strong> prisoners,<br />

who were thought to have been slaves before <strong>the</strong> war. Distinguished counsel<br />

represented both sides: Mitchell <strong>the</strong> defense, <strong>the</strong> state attorney general <strong>the</strong> prosecution.<br />

After extensive correspondence between Confederate and South Carolina<br />

officials, both civil and military, <strong>the</strong> court ruled that “persons engaged as soldiers<br />

in <strong>the</strong> act of war” were not subject to state slave statutes and <strong>the</strong> four prisoners<br />

rejoined <strong>the</strong>ir comrades. The 54th Massachusetts’ captives spent <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong><br />

war in a camp at Florence, South Carolina. At least twelve of <strong>the</strong> twenty-nine<br />

died in captivity. 73<br />

The second assault on Fort Wagner had been a failure. The 54th Massachusetts’<br />

role did not go unremarked, but <strong>the</strong> comment was mixed. A New York<br />

Times editorialist noted that <strong>the</strong> idea that “negroes won’t fight at all” had been<br />

“knocked on <strong>the</strong> head” but that “<strong>the</strong> great mistake now is that more is expected of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se black regiments than any reasonable man would expect of white ones.” A<br />

black regiment, <strong>the</strong> writer went on, “freshly recruited and which had never been<br />

under fire, [was] assigned <strong>the</strong> advance, which nobody would have dreamed of<br />

giving to equally raw white troops.” Within <strong>the</strong> <strong>Army</strong> itself, rumor ran that when<br />

<strong>the</strong> 54th Massachusetts formed up on <strong>the</strong> morning after <strong>the</strong> failed attack, half of<br />

<strong>the</strong> survivors had lost <strong>the</strong>ir rifles. 74<br />

Missing arms or not, <strong>the</strong>re were several reasons for <strong>the</strong> defeat. In <strong>the</strong> first<br />

place, Generals Gillmore and Seymour had entertained too great hopes of an<br />

easy capture of Fort Wagner. Gillmore’s artillery had shattered Fort Pulaski’s<br />

masonry <strong>the</strong> year before, but Fort Wagner’s earthworks were more durable. General<br />

Strong, <strong>the</strong> brigade commander, was a Massachusetts man and heeded a plea<br />

for active service from ano<strong>the</strong>r Massachusetts man, Colonel Shaw. In so doing,<br />

Strong placed in advance a regiment so tired that when one of its officers was<br />

wounded in <strong>the</strong> attack he “went to sleep on <strong>the</strong> rampart” of <strong>the</strong> fort. Moreover,<br />

being <strong>the</strong> largest regiment in <strong>the</strong> brigade, <strong>the</strong> 54th Massachusetts formed two<br />

five-company lines, a front too wide to negotiate <strong>the</strong> spit of land it had to cross<br />

on <strong>the</strong> way to <strong>the</strong> fort. This broad front on a narrow beach disarranged both lines<br />

and threw <strong>the</strong> rearmost men into <strong>the</strong> regiments immediately behind. Finally, nei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>the</strong> men nor <strong>the</strong> officers of <strong>the</strong> 54th Massachusetts had been under heavy fire<br />

before and some of <strong>the</strong> officers were very young. Captain Appleton’s memoir<br />

names one who was 19 years old, ano<strong>the</strong>r who was 18, and two who were 17.<br />

This combination of factors meant that <strong>the</strong> assault on Fort Wagner would have<br />

required a miracle to succeed. As it was, <strong>the</strong> Confederates were able to repel an<br />

attacking force that outnumbered <strong>the</strong>m nearly three to one, even though many<br />

of <strong>the</strong> defenders were too demoralized to offer much resistance. The men of one<br />

72 Appleton Jnl, p. 125 (quotation); Emilio, Brave Black Regiment, p. 97.<br />

73 Howard C. Westwood, “Captive Black Union Soldiers in Charleston—What To Do?” Civil<br />

War <strong>History</strong> 28 (1982): 28–44 (quotation, p. 40); Emilio, Brave Black Regiment, pp. 298–99.<br />

74 New York Times, 31 July 1863; John C. Gray and John C. Ropes, War Letters, 1862–1865<br />

(Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1927), p. 184.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!