25.02.2013 Views

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

South Texas, 1864–1867 451<br />

ists evacuated Bagdad and Matamoros. In <strong>the</strong> course of <strong>the</strong> summer, <strong>the</strong> Liberals<br />

finally gained control of all of nor<strong>the</strong>rn Mexico. 68<br />

The expulsion of <strong>the</strong> Imperialists <strong>by</strong> no means resulted in a reign of law and<br />

order. The new governor of Tamaulipas imposed a policy of forced “loans” and<br />

confiscation that hurt <strong>the</strong> leading merchants of Matamoros, many of whom were<br />

United States citizens who had favored <strong>the</strong> Imperialists and had grown rich trading<br />

in cotton and arms on behalf of <strong>the</strong> Confederacy. The president of Mexico,<br />

Benito Juárez, himself disowned <strong>the</strong> governor’s actions. Ano<strong>the</strong>r local strongman<br />

proclaimed himself governor, but before he could march on Matamoros, o<strong>the</strong>r parties<br />

<strong>the</strong>re overthrew <strong>the</strong> incumbent, who escaped across <strong>the</strong> river to Brownsville.<br />

Juárez detested <strong>the</strong> new regime in Matamoros as much as he had <strong>the</strong> old one, and<br />

in November Escobedo led an army of thirty-five hundred men toward <strong>the</strong> city. 69<br />

With a battle imminent, <strong>the</strong> merchants of Matamoros looked for means of staving<br />

off <strong>the</strong> new governor’s defeat until <strong>the</strong>y could collect debts amounting to some<br />

$600,000 that he had accrued during his three months in office. The merchants found<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir means in Col. Thomas D. Sedgwick, of <strong>the</strong> 114th <strong>US</strong>CI, who commanded <strong>the</strong><br />

post at Brownsville. The merchants convinced Sedgwick that <strong>the</strong> governor’s troops<br />

might riot and pillage <strong>the</strong> town. No doubt remembering <strong>the</strong> days of disorder at Bagdad<br />

in January, <strong>the</strong> colonel agreed to send a small force across <strong>the</strong> river. Although<br />

he wrote to Sheridan on 22 November, telling him of his plan, his letter could barely<br />

have reached Sheridan’s desk in New Orleans <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong> time he acted. 70<br />

The black infantry companies in <strong>the</strong> Brownsville garrison were responsible for a<br />

military pontoon bridge that <strong>the</strong>y had brought from Virginia. On <strong>the</strong> night of 24 November,<br />

two companies of <strong>the</strong> 19th and 114th <strong>US</strong>CIs crossed <strong>the</strong> Rio Grande in boats<br />

and secured a site on <strong>the</strong> Mexican bank. The next day, <strong>the</strong>y assembled <strong>the</strong> structure<br />

of boats and planks and 118 officers and men of <strong>the</strong> 4th U.S. Cavalry clattered across<br />

it to occupy Matamoros. The black infantrymen guarded <strong>the</strong> south end of <strong>the</strong> bridge<br />

and a ferry landing two miles from <strong>the</strong> city while a battery of <strong>the</strong> 1st U.S. Artillery<br />

positioned its guns at <strong>the</strong> north end of <strong>the</strong> bridge. No longer responsible for patrolling<br />

<strong>the</strong> town <strong>the</strong>mselves, <strong>the</strong> defenders of Matamoros were able to repel a Liberal attack<br />

on 27 November, inflicting some one thousand casualties on Escobedo’s force. 71<br />

Weeks earlier, Sheridan had warned Sedgwick that <strong>the</strong> United States pursued a<br />

course of strict neutrality in Mexico’s quarrels but contradicted himself somewhat<br />

<strong>by</strong> emphasizing that <strong>the</strong> policy was in force especially “against <strong>the</strong> adherents of <strong>the</strong><br />

imperial buccaneer representing <strong>the</strong> so-called Imperial Government.” When Sheridan<br />

learned that Sedgwick had acceded to <strong>the</strong> request of <strong>the</strong> Imperialist sympathizers<br />

of Matamoros, he ordered him to withdraw United States troops across <strong>the</strong> river at<br />

68 Maj Gen P. H. Sheridan to Lt Gen U. S. Grant, 7 May 1866 (“The Liberals”), NA Microfilm<br />

Pub M1635, Headquarters of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Army</strong>, LS, roll 94; Thompson, Cortina, pp. 175–81 (“Canales<br />

outlaws,” pp. 175–76).<br />

69 “Occupation of Mexican Territory,” 39th Cong., 2d sess., H. Ex. Doc. 8 (serial 1,287), p. 3;<br />

Thompson, Cortina, pp. 181–85.<br />

70 Col T. D. Sedgwick to Maj Gen P. H. Sheridan, 22 Nov 1866, and Maj Gen P. H. Sheridan<br />

to Gen U. S. Grant, 27 Nov 1866, both in Andrew Johnson Papers, Library of Congress; “Mexico,”<br />

39th Cong., 2d sess., H. Ex. Doc. 17 (serial 1,288), p. 177; Thompson, Cortina, pp. 185–86.<br />

71 NA M594, roll 216, 114th <strong>US</strong>CI; NA M617, roll 152, Fort Brown, Nov 1866; “Present Condition<br />

of Mexico,” 39th Cong., 2d sess, H. Ex. Doc. 76 (serial 1,292), pp. 550–52, 554; Thompson, Cortina,<br />

pp. 186–88.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!