25.02.2013 Views

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The South Atlantic Coast, 1861–1863 53<br />

ment in <strong>the</strong> attack, but not <strong>by</strong> much:<br />

<strong>the</strong> 7th New Hampshire and 48th New<br />

York, with strengths that were about<br />

three-quarters and two-thirds that of<br />

<strong>the</strong> 54th Massachusetts, lost 216 and<br />

242—smaller totals, but just as large,<br />

or larger, percentages. Total Union<br />

losses were 246 killed, 880 wounded,<br />

and 389 missing. 70<br />

The missing men represented a<br />

worry for <strong>the</strong> 54th Massachusetts, as<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r black soldiers taken prisoner<br />

would for <strong>the</strong>ir regiments throughout<br />

<strong>the</strong> war. The Confederacy’s first<br />

official reaction to <strong>the</strong> Union’s<br />

raising black regiments had been to<br />

declare that captured officers and<br />

men of those regiments would be<br />

tried in state courts on charges of<br />

insurrection, a capital offense. The<br />

federal government soon announced<br />

policies of retaliation for mistreatment<br />

of prisoners; and for <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong><br />

war, <strong>the</strong> matter depended largely on<br />

<strong>the</strong> judgment of <strong>the</strong> generals on both<br />

sides who commanded field armies<br />

and geographical departments. 71<br />

<strong>Of</strong>ficers and men of <strong>the</strong> 54th<br />

Massachusetts learned eventually<br />

that twenty-nine of <strong>the</strong> men reported<br />

missing at Fort Wagner had been taken<br />

prisoner; <strong>the</strong> rest had been killed.<br />

Word reached <strong>the</strong> regiment in December<br />

that two of <strong>the</strong> prisoners, Sgt. Walter<br />

A. Jeffries and Cpl. Charles Hardy,<br />

were to have stood trial for insurrection<br />

but that a prominent Charleston<br />

Sgt. Maj. Lewis Douglass of <strong>the</strong><br />

54th Massachusetts was a son of<br />

<strong>the</strong> abolitionist<br />

Frederick Douglass.<br />

attorney, Nelson Mitchell, had volunteered to defend <strong>the</strong>m. Mitchell, according<br />

to rumor, pointed out that <strong>the</strong> court would have to try Jeffries and Hardy at<br />

<strong>the</strong> place where <strong>the</strong>y had committed <strong>the</strong> offense of insurrection and that Fort<br />

70 OR, ser. 1, vol. 28, pt. 1, pp. 10–12, 362–63; Emilio, Brave Black Regiment, p. 105; Peter C.<br />

Ripley et al., eds., The Black Abolitionist Papers, 5 vols. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina<br />

Press, 1985–1992), 5: 241 (quotation).<br />

71 Glatthaar, Forged in Battle, pp. 201–03. For examples of discussion at <strong>the</strong> local level, see<br />

correspondence of Brig. Gen. Q. A. Gillmore, commanding <strong>the</strong> Union Department of <strong>the</strong> South, and<br />

General P. G. T. Beauregard, commanding <strong>the</strong> Confederate Department of South Carolina, Georgia,<br />

and Florida, July–August 1863. OR, ser. 1, vol. 28, pt. 2, pp. 11–13, 21, 25–26, 37–38, 45–46.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!