25.02.2013 Views

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Virginia, May–October 1864 337<br />

of baggage wagons allowed to each regiment and to each brigade, division, and<br />

corps headquarters. Meade’s army needed its wheeled transport to haul rations<br />

and ammunition through <strong>the</strong> familiar, fought-over Virginia countryside between<br />

Washington and Richmond (see Map 8). 2<br />

While <strong>the</strong> Union’s main armies were in motion, a fourth, led <strong>by</strong> Maj. Gen.<br />

Benjamin F. Butler, would advance from Fort Monroe up <strong>the</strong> James River toward<br />

Richmond. Grant himself visited Fort Monroe in early April to discuss <strong>the</strong> move,<br />

for Butler was a national figure, one of <strong>the</strong> nation’s leading War Democrats—certainly<br />

<strong>the</strong> most prominent one in uniform—and too important to ignore in forming<br />

plans for <strong>the</strong> spring campaign. The two generals were in substantial agreement<br />

about an attack up <strong>the</strong> James, but Grant thought it best to confirm <strong>the</strong> results of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

conference with a letter marked Confidential. Concentration of force was essential,<br />

he told Butler. As <strong>the</strong> <strong>Army</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Potomac advanced south toward <strong>the</strong> <strong>Army</strong> of<br />

Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Virginia and Butler’s <strong>Army</strong> of <strong>the</strong> James moved northwest toward <strong>the</strong><br />

Confederate capital, <strong>the</strong> two would draw closer toge<strong>the</strong>r and eventually coordinate<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir operations. Butler’s army would receive a reinforcement of ten thousand<br />

men drawn from Union forces in South Carolina, Grant said. “All I want is all <strong>the</strong><br />

troops in <strong>the</strong> field that can be got in for <strong>the</strong> Spring Campaign,” he explained in a<br />

letter to Sherman. Since Butler had served only in administrative posts, Grant assigned<br />

Maj. Gen. William F. Smith, a former corps commander in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Army</strong> of <strong>the</strong><br />

Potomac, to direct command of operations. Grant, who had graduated from West<br />

Point two years ahead of Smith, thought him “a very able officer, [but] obstinate.” 3<br />

Butler’s force included a division of six <strong>US</strong>CI regiments—<strong>the</strong> 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th,<br />

10th, and 22d, along with Battery B, 2d United States Colored Artillery (<strong>US</strong>CA).<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r black troops on <strong>the</strong> peninsula between <strong>the</strong> James and York Rivers included<br />

<strong>the</strong> 1st and 2d United States Colored Cavalries (<strong>US</strong>CCs), at Williamsburg. Some<br />

seventy miles to <strong>the</strong> north, but still within Butler’s command, <strong>the</strong> 36th <strong>US</strong>CI guarded<br />

prisoners of war at Point Lookout, Maryland. 4<br />

Brig. Gen. Edward W. Hinks commanded <strong>the</strong> six regiments that accompanied<br />

<strong>the</strong> main force. A Massachusetts officer who had served with Butler in Maryland<br />

during <strong>the</strong> first weeks of <strong>the</strong> war, Hinks had received a severe wound while leading<br />

his regiment at Antietam in 1862 and had spent more than a year afterward in<br />

administrative posts. When he saw that Butler was to take charge of <strong>the</strong> Department<br />

of Virginia and North Carolina in <strong>the</strong> fall of 1863, he wrote to <strong>the</strong> general,<br />

requesting a field command. Hinks arrived at Fort Monroe in late April, just as<br />

news of <strong>the</strong> Fort Pillow massacre reached <strong>the</strong> East. Within a week, he asked to<br />

replace his division’s “unreliable” weapons, which might, he said, “answer for<br />

troops who will be well cared for if <strong>the</strong>y fall into [enemy] hands, but to troops who<br />

cannot afford to be beaten, and will not be taken, <strong>the</strong> best arms should be given that<br />

<strong>the</strong> country can afford.” The 1st <strong>US</strong>CI regiment, its colonel complained, carried<br />

2 The War of <strong>the</strong> Rebellion: A Compilation of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Of</strong>ficial Records of <strong>the</strong> Union and Confederate<br />

Armies, 70 vols. in 128 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing <strong>Of</strong>fice, 1880–1901), ser. 1, 33:<br />

827–29, 919–21 (quotation, p. 828) (hereafter cited as OR).<br />

3 OR, ser. 1, vol. 32, pt. 3, p. 305 (“All I want”); 33: 794–95 (Confidential); vol. 36, pt. 3, p. 43<br />

(“a very able”). William G. Robertson, Back Door to Richmond: The Bermuda Hundred Campaign,<br />

April–June 1864 (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1987), pp. 18–24.<br />

4 OR, ser. 1, 33: 1055, 1057.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!