25.02.2013 Views

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The South Atlantic Coast, 1863 –1865 67<br />

<strong>the</strong>m was blocked <strong>by</strong> troops of <strong>the</strong> next brigade coming into action, and thick<br />

woods impeded movement on ei<strong>the</strong>r side. Colonel Fribley was killed and his<br />

second in command received two wounds. Taking over <strong>the</strong> regiment, Capt.<br />

Romanzo C. Bailey ordered what men he could to support an artillery battery<br />

that was under attack, but out-of-control battery horses spoiled <strong>the</strong> movement<br />

<strong>by</strong> charging <strong>the</strong> infantry and <strong>the</strong> artillery men had to abandon <strong>the</strong>ir guns. It<br />

seemed to Norton that “<strong>the</strong> regiment had no commander . . . , and every officer<br />

was doing <strong>the</strong> best he could with his squad independent of any one else.”<br />

Learning that his men had run out of ammunition, Bailey withdrew <strong>the</strong>m behind<br />

<strong>the</strong> 54th Massachusetts, which had hurried forward. The 8th <strong>US</strong>CI had<br />

suffered more than 50 percent casualties in less than three hours: more than<br />

three hundred killed, wounded, and missing out of fewer than six hundred men.<br />

“From all I can learn . . . <strong>the</strong> regiment was under fire for more than two hours,”<br />

Lieutenant Norton told his fa<strong>the</strong>r, “though it did not seem to me so long. I never<br />

know anything of <strong>the</strong> time in a battle, though.” As <strong>the</strong> Union <strong>Army</strong> began its<br />

retreat that evening, <strong>the</strong> 8th <strong>US</strong>CI survivors, along with those of <strong>the</strong> 7th New<br />

Hampshire, guarded <strong>the</strong> wagon train. 22<br />

While <strong>the</strong> 8th <strong>US</strong>CI was losing more than half its strength, Col. William B.<br />

Barton’s brigade, three white regiments from New York, advanced on <strong>the</strong> right<br />

and engaged <strong>the</strong> Confederates for four hours. “It was soon apparent that we were<br />

greatly outnumbered,” Barton reported afterward. “For a long time we were sorely<br />

pressed, but <strong>the</strong> indomitable and unflinching courage of my men and officers at<br />

length prevailed, and . . . <strong>the</strong> enemy’s left was forced back, and he was content to<br />

permit us to retire. . . . The enemy were . . . too badly punished to feel disposed to<br />

molest us.” 23 Barton’s report was a remarkable piece of writing, an assertion that<br />

he had beaten <strong>the</strong> Confederates so badly that <strong>the</strong>y had to let him retreat. In fact,<br />

his brigade lost more than eight hundred men, including all three regimental commanders,<br />

before it got away. 24<br />

As <strong>the</strong> fight continued, word went to <strong>the</strong> rear of <strong>the</strong> Union column for <strong>the</strong> two<br />

black regiments <strong>the</strong>re to hurry forward. The 54th Massachusetts and 1st North Carolina<br />

doubled up <strong>the</strong> road, shedding knapsacks and blanket rolls as <strong>the</strong>y ran past “hundreds<br />

of wounded and stragglers” who announced a Union defeat and predicted <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

imminent deaths. By <strong>the</strong> time <strong>the</strong> two regiments arrived at <strong>the</strong> front, Barton’s brigade<br />

was withdrawing and <strong>the</strong> 7th Connecticut, one of <strong>the</strong> first regiments in action that<br />

day, had just received orders to fall back. Expecting a Confederate attack on his left<br />

flank, Seymour sent <strong>the</strong> 54th Massachusetts into <strong>the</strong> line on <strong>the</strong> left of <strong>the</strong> 7th Con-<br />

Regimental Books, RG 94, Rcds of <strong>the</strong> Adjutant General’s <strong>Of</strong>fice, NA; Norton, <strong>Army</strong> Letters, pp.<br />

198, 202. On Civil War tactics, see Paddy Griffith, Battle Tactics of <strong>the</strong> Civil War (New Haven: Yale<br />

University Press, 1987), pp. 74, 87–89, 101.<br />

22 OR, ser. 1, vol. 35, pt. 1, pp. 312–14; Norton, <strong>Army</strong> Letters, p. 198 (“were stunned”), 204 (“<strong>the</strong><br />

regiment,” “From all”); New York Times, 1 March 1864. According to Captain Bailey, <strong>the</strong> 8th <strong>US</strong>CI<br />

took 565 officers and men into battle and lost a total of 343 killed, wounded, and missing. Col J. R.<br />

Hawley, <strong>the</strong> brigade commander, gave <strong>the</strong> regiment’s strength as 575; Seymour put <strong>the</strong> loss at 310.<br />

OR, ser. 1, vol. 35, pt. 1, pp. 298, 303, 312. These figures indicate casualties somewhere between 53.9<br />

and 60.7 percent. Surgeon Charles P. Heichhold estimated <strong>the</strong> length of <strong>the</strong> fight at “2 1/2 hours.”<br />

Anglo-African, 12 Mar 1864.<br />

23 OR, ser. 1, vol. 35, pt. 1, p. 302.<br />

24 Seymour gave <strong>the</strong> figure as 824, Barton as 811. OR, ser. 1, vol. 35, pt. 1, pp. 298, 303.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!