25.02.2013 Views

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Reconstruction, 1865–1867 487<br />

towns sorely missed “<strong>the</strong> presence of at least a few troops,” and that agents<br />

were “powerless without <strong>the</strong>m.” “In almost every case, . . . <strong>the</strong> withdrawal of<br />

troops has been followed <strong>by</strong> outrages upon <strong>the</strong> freed people,” he wrote. “A<br />

large number of troops is not required, but . . . unless small garrisons are kept<br />

at many points, most unfortunate results will certainly follow.” Tillson was<br />

right: reports of murders in Georgia during 1866, although sketchy, indicate<br />

a sevenfold increase after <strong>the</strong> 103d <strong>US</strong>CI mustered out in April, leaving only<br />

eight companies of regular infantry in <strong>the</strong> state. A report from South Carolina<br />

shows a similar, although less pronounced, trend after June, when <strong>the</strong> musterout<br />

of white volunteers <strong>the</strong>re left <strong>the</strong> 128th <strong>US</strong>CI, thirteen companies of regular<br />

infantry, and two companies of regular cavalry as <strong>the</strong> occupying force in<br />

<strong>the</strong> state. Although South Carolina was smaller than Georgia, its garrisons included<br />

nearly 25 percent more federal troops. While white peace officers were<br />

reluctant to arrest white murderers of black people and white juries refused<br />

to convict <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>the</strong> increase of reported murders in both states after troop<br />

withdrawals suggests that even an occupation force of infantry served as some<br />

deterrent to racial violence. 68<br />

At <strong>the</strong> beginning of 1866, some sixty-five thousand black soldiers were<br />

still in service, representing slightly more than 53 percent of <strong>the</strong> remaining<br />

Civil War volunteers. Two months later, after more white regiments mustered<br />

out, <strong>the</strong> number of black troops had shrunk to fewer than forty thousand, but<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir proportion of <strong>the</strong> force had grown to nearly 60 percent. By early summer,<br />

only 17,320 black volunteers remained, constituting nearly three-quarters of<br />

<strong>the</strong> men still in service who had volunteered “for three years or <strong>the</strong> war.” Sharing<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir duties were companies of <strong>the</strong> Regular <strong>Army</strong>—more than 70 percent<br />

of <strong>the</strong> regular infantry force, one regiment of cavalry, and one of artillery—but<br />

some eighteen thousand regulars could hardly compensate for <strong>the</strong> mustering<br />

out of nearly one hundred thousand volunteers, white and black, during <strong>the</strong> first<br />

six months of <strong>the</strong> year. 69<br />

Despite pleas and protests from commanding officers and Freedmen’s Bureau<br />

agents, troop numbers in <strong>the</strong> South continued to dwindle. General Beecher asked<br />

for a company of his old regiment, <strong>the</strong> 35th <strong>US</strong>CI, to escort him while he settled<br />

labor contracts near <strong>the</strong> South Carolina coast that winter. In Kentucky and Tennessee,<br />

<strong>the</strong> assistant commissioner for those states told General Howard, troops<br />

had become so scarce <strong>by</strong> spring that <strong>the</strong>y “could do but little else than guard <strong>the</strong><br />

government property and garrison <strong>the</strong> chief cities.” The Bureau agent at Hamburg,<br />

Arkansas, an officer of <strong>the</strong> 5th <strong>US</strong>CC, had to abandon his station until “troops sufficient<br />

to protect him from personal violence” could be sent <strong>the</strong>re. In <strong>the</strong> southwest<br />

corner of <strong>the</strong> state, a former officer of <strong>the</strong> 113th <strong>US</strong>CI acting as a Bureau agent<br />

feared an armed conflict. “The most direct cause is <strong>the</strong> colored troops stationed<br />

here—<strong>the</strong> feeling is very bitter, and I daily look for a conflict,” he reported. “It is<br />

68 OR, ser. 3, 5: 13; “Freedmen’s Bureau,” p. 315 (“<strong>the</strong>ir duties”), p. 328 (“<strong>the</strong> presence”); Rpts<br />

of Persons Murdered, Dists of Atlanta, Brunswick, Columbus, Griffin, Macon, Marietta, Rome,<br />

Savannah, Thomasville, Entry 642, Georgia: Rpts of Murders and Outrages, RG 105, Rcds of <strong>the</strong><br />

BRFAL, NA; Rpt of Outrages, NA M869, roll 34.<br />

69 OR, ser. 3, 5: 138–39, 932, 973; <strong>Army</strong> and Navy Journal, 28 July 1866.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!