25.02.2013 Views

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

Freedom by the Sword - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

466<br />

<strong>Freedom</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sword</strong>: The U.S. Colored Troops, 1862–1867<br />

a brick, and he got up and came after me again, and <strong>the</strong>n I knocked him down<br />

with a brick.<br />

The investigator concluded, “I shall endeavor to teach <strong>the</strong> inlisted men . . . to avoid<br />

if possible difficulty with citizens, yet I will at <strong>the</strong> same time teach <strong>the</strong>m never to<br />

do so at <strong>the</strong> expense of <strong>the</strong>ir dignity and mand-hood and to disgrace <strong>the</strong> uniform<br />

<strong>the</strong>y wear.” Although such attacks made up only a small part of <strong>the</strong> violence directed<br />

against freedmen, <strong>the</strong>y became more frequent in <strong>the</strong> last months of 1865.<br />

In December, reports appeared of black soldiers shot dead <strong>by</strong> white civilians at<br />

Atlanta and in Calhoun and Hinds Counties, Mississippi. 22<br />

Besides white Sou<strong>the</strong>rners, ano<strong>the</strong>r group that was often hostile to black soldiers<br />

and civilians was <strong>the</strong> body of white federal troops in <strong>the</strong> South. Most of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se men did not differ in <strong>the</strong>ir attitudes from <strong>the</strong> unfavorable national consensus<br />

regarding black people, and <strong>the</strong>y often used <strong>the</strong>ir authority as members of <strong>the</strong><br />

occupying force to annoy and injure black civilians and, at times, <strong>the</strong> black men<br />

who were <strong>the</strong>ir own comrades in arms. One such incident occurred in Washington,<br />

D.C., in October 1865. The 107th <strong>US</strong>CI had just arrived from North Carolina to<br />

take up garrison duties around <strong>the</strong> capital and pitched its tents near <strong>the</strong> Soldier’s<br />

Rest, a transit camp at <strong>the</strong> Baltimore and Ohio Railroad depot, near <strong>the</strong> Capitol.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> morning of 14 October, 3 officers and 1,576 enlisted men of <strong>the</strong> 6th U.S.<br />

Cavalry arrived, having just turned in <strong>the</strong>ir horses before taking ship for Texas.<br />

The officers quickly “left for points ‘up town,’” <strong>the</strong> quartermaster in charge of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Soldier’s Rest learned, presumably in search of amusement. Within hours, “a<br />

difficulty occurred . . . followed <strong>by</strong> blows, showers of stones and one gun shot”<br />

that killed a soldier of <strong>the</strong> 107th. Authorities summoned five o<strong>the</strong>r regiments to<br />

<strong>the</strong> scene before <strong>the</strong> riot subsided. Similar conflicts occurred in Charleston, South<br />

Carolina, and in o<strong>the</strong>r cities where black and white soldiers with too few officers<br />

and too much time on <strong>the</strong>ir hands encountered each o<strong>the</strong>r. 23<br />

Most of <strong>the</strong> violence directed against black people in <strong>the</strong> South came on impulse<br />

from individual whites. According to one count of more than fifteen hundred<br />

attacks on black Texans during <strong>the</strong> years from 1865 to 1868, nearly 70 percent<br />

were individual acts. The unpredictable nature of such violence made it all <strong>the</strong><br />

more intimidating, but what drew national attention to <strong>the</strong> campaign to subjugate<br />

<strong>the</strong> freedmen was its most distinctive feature: groups of men who rode disguised,<br />

22 Maj D. Conwell to Capt R. Wilson, 20 Dec 1865 (quotations verbatim), 5th <strong>US</strong>CA, Regimental<br />

Books, RG 94, NA; Lt Col G. Curkendall to Brig Gen D. Tillson, 26 Dec 1865 (G–18–1866), NA<br />

M752, roll 20; Maj Gen M. F. Force to Maj M. P. Bestow, 12 Dec 1865 (F–226–MDT–1865), Entry<br />

926, Dept of <strong>the</strong> Cumberland, LR, pt. 1, RG 393, NA; Lt Col M. H. Tuttle to 1st Lt W. H. Williams,<br />

21 Dec 1865, 50th <strong>US</strong>CI, Entry 57C, RG 94, NA; Joe G. Taylor, Louisiana Reconstructed, 1863–<br />

1877 (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1974), p. 421.<br />

23 Capt W. W. Rogers to Capt A. H. Wands, 15 Oct 1865 (R–655–DW–1865); Capt E. M. Camp<br />

to Colonel Taylor [Col J. H. Taylor], 17 Oct 1865 (quotations), filed with (f/w) RG–655–DW–1865;<br />

Brig Gen F. T. Dent to General [Brig Gen A. V. Kautz], 14 Oct 1865; all in Entry 5382, Dept of<br />

Washington, LR, pt. 1, RG 393, NA. 6th U.S. Cavalry return, Oct 1865, NA Microfilm Pub M744,<br />

Returns from Regular <strong>Army</strong> Cav Rgts, roll 61; Mark L. Bradley, Bluecoats and Tarheels: Soldiers<br />

and Civilians in Reconstruction North Carolina (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2009),<br />

pp. 66–67, 123–24; Robert J. Zalimas, “A Disturbance in <strong>the</strong> City: Black and White Soldiers in<br />

Postwar Charleston,” in Black Soldiers in Blue: African American Troops in <strong>the</strong> Civil War Era, ed.<br />

John David Smith (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2002), pp. 361–90.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!