20.03.2013 Views

Eurobodalla Integrated Water Cycle Management Strategy

Eurobodalla Integrated Water Cycle Management Strategy

Eurobodalla Integrated Water Cycle Management Strategy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Eurobodalla</strong> <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Cycle</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong><br />

<strong>Eurobodalla</strong>. The two options are either as a long term regular water source or as a drought<br />

contingency option.<br />

A desalination plant provides a drought proof supply source and the novel technology has<br />

potential to attract tourist visitation. It reduces the dependence on surface waters, however<br />

it produces a brine stream that must be disposed of. The plant needs to be located on the<br />

coast, which may reduce the visual amenity of the area and may be located on a potential<br />

development area. Desalination plants can be expensive to operate due to their high energy<br />

use, which can result in greenhouse gas emission. Like opportunities 2 and 3, it spreads<br />

risks associated with water supply including reducing reliance on extended delivery mains.<br />

Social and Environmental Aspects of the Long term Supply Opportunities<br />

The above opportunities, whilst being developed based on a 50-year planning horizon, will<br />

be implemented in stages. The TBL assessment table below provides the comparative<br />

environmental, social and economic benefit of each strategy option.<br />

Table 8-9 Social and Environmental Aspects – Long term Supply Opportunities<br />

Opportunities Social Environmental<br />

Opportunity 1<br />

Raise Deep Creek Dam<br />

Opportunity 2 New<br />

Southern Off-River Storage<br />

Opportunity 3 New Central<br />

Off-River Storage<br />

Opportunity 4 Desalination<br />

Maximises use of existing assets<br />

Drought security confined to one storage<br />

Limited construction work<br />

Spreads drought security (and water quality)<br />

risk between two storages and two supply<br />

sources<br />

Acceptance (and social impact) of proposal to<br />

build new storage<br />

Reduced reliance on extended delivery mains<br />

Spreads drought security risk between two<br />

storages but extraction based on one supply<br />

source<br />

More water available to environment and<br />

irrigators on Tuross River<br />

Acceptance (and social impact) of proposal to<br />

build new storage<br />

High pumping costs<br />

Plant located on possible development area<br />

Technology has potential to attract tourist<br />

visitation<br />

Public acceptance of this option for potable<br />

uses (unknown)<br />

Enhances drought-proofing of the scheme<br />

Reduced reliance on extended delivery mains<br />

Expensive to operate<br />

Proposal footprint<br />

predominantly confined to<br />

previously disturbed areas<br />

Further increases extraction<br />

from Moruya River, although in<br />

high flows<br />

River harvesting shared<br />

between two sources<br />

Creates a new footprint and<br />

associated environmental<br />

impact<br />

Increased reliance on Moruya<br />

River and higher environmental<br />

impacts to river environment<br />

Tuross River environment<br />

protected<br />

High energy use, resulting in<br />

greenhouse gas emission<br />

Potential issues with brine<br />

disposal<br />

Reduced dependence on<br />

surface waters<br />

The Project Team ranked the above opportunities. The triple bottom line assessment<br />

represented in Table 8-10 provides the relative ranking of each strategy option.<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!