20.03.2013 Views

Eurobodalla Integrated Water Cycle Management Strategy

Eurobodalla Integrated Water Cycle Management Strategy

Eurobodalla Integrated Water Cycle Management Strategy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Eurobodalla</strong> <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Cycle</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong><br />

Connecting Nelligen to the region’s water supply from Batemans Bay would require a pipe<br />

extension of 7.2 km from Batemans Bay along the existing road line. The average annual<br />

and peak reticulated water demands for the full development situation would be about<br />

28 ML/a and 0.20 ML/d respectively.<br />

The scheme facilities necessary to provide a full reticulated water supply to Nelligen would<br />

be similar to those required for a supplemented reticulated supply as discussed previously.<br />

The facility and component sizes will, however, need to be slightly larger. The provision of<br />

larger pipes and facilities enables the provision of fire fighting services at minimal extra<br />

cost.<br />

Improved <strong>Management</strong> of Existing On-site Wastewater Facilities<br />

Sewage in Nelligen is currently treated by on-site systems. It is recommended that Council<br />

consider the management options for sewage treatment for the village. The seepage from<br />

existing on-site wastewater management systems could be reduced by regularly emptying<br />

the contents of the septic tanks and installing monitoring systems to prevent septic tank<br />

overflows and to assess the integrity of the tanks. Regular pumpouts and monitoring have<br />

the potential to minimise many of the environmental and public health impacts associated<br />

with the operation of septic systems.<br />

A single contract could be arranged by the Council or by the community such that the septic<br />

tanks are pumped at set time intervals. This would cover both effluent and sullage<br />

pumpout. The cost of this pumpout could be evenly split between the residents. To facilitate<br />

pumping every tank would require a smaller holding tank or pumpout facility.<br />

Although this opportunity would reduce the potential of waterway and aquifer contamination,<br />

it may result in additional community impacts, such as odour complaints associated with<br />

pumpouts and the movement of trucks in the neighbourhood.<br />

Enhanced <strong>Management</strong> of Existing On-site Wastewater Facilities<br />

There are several options available to upgrade the existing on-site wastewater<br />

management systems to achieve greater public health and environmental outcomes. The<br />

first option is to retain the existing septic tank and upgrade the on-site effluent management<br />

system. An example of this would be the replacement of the adsorption trenches with lined<br />

evapotranspiration beds, which achieve a higher level of water and nutrient uptake through<br />

plants.<br />

Another alternative is to upgrade the septic system to one that achieves nutrient removal<br />

and therefore results in a higher quality effluent discharge (e.g. aerated tanks). This would<br />

increase the potential uses available to the resulting treated effluent.<br />

Both these options would minimise the potential of groundwater contamination and its<br />

associated environmental problems, as well as reducing the likelihood of public health<br />

issues and odour complaints.<br />

Centralised <strong>Management</strong> of Effluent from On-site Facilities<br />

As an alternative to providing a full reticulated sewage system, the effluent from existing onsite<br />

systems (e.g. septic tanks) could be collected and transported to a central treatment<br />

facility. This type of system relies on smaller pipes than those required for a conventional<br />

reticulated sewerage system. Pipes can be laid in the ground at a lesser gradient and at a<br />

more shallow depth than that of conventional gravity sewerage, as the pipes carry only<br />

entrained solids thus having minimal self-cleaning velocity requirements.<br />

The effluent could be treated locally or transported to Batemans Bay STP. Appendix P<br />

provides information on the various effluent transport and local treatment options.<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!