21.03.2013 Views

Safety in the vicinity of non-towered aerodromes - Australian ...

Safety in the vicinity of non-towered aerodromes - Australian ...

Safety in the vicinity of non-towered aerodromes - Australian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

The <strong>Australian</strong> Transport <strong>Safety</strong> Bureau (ATSB) proactively monitors aviation<br />

safety through <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> accident and <strong>in</strong>cident data, collectively termed<br />

occurrence data, to determ<strong>in</strong>e whe<strong>the</strong>r important trends are emerg<strong>in</strong>g. In recent<br />

years, <strong>the</strong> ATSB has received an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number <strong>of</strong> occurrence reports from<br />

pilots regard<strong>in</strong>g operations at <strong>non</strong>-<strong>towered</strong> <strong>aerodromes</strong>. This extends to <strong>the</strong><br />

associated use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> radio frequencies allocated for communication between pilots<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>non</strong>-<strong>towered</strong> <strong>aerodromes</strong> to establish situational awareness and separation<br />

(Common Traffic Advisory Frequencies (CTAF), and formerly CTAF(R) (prior to 3<br />

June 2010) and Mandatory Broadcast Zones (MBZs) (prior to 24 November 2005)).<br />

Non-<strong>towered</strong> <strong>aerodromes</strong> are those where a cont<strong>in</strong>uous air traffic control presence<br />

does not exist, or is temporarily not available (such as outside <strong>of</strong> air traffic control<br />

(ATC) or control tower operat<strong>in</strong>g hours). Aircraft are specifically considered to be<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vic<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>of</strong> a <strong>non</strong>-<strong>towered</strong> aerodrome if <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>in</strong> uncontrolled airspace,<br />

with<strong>in</strong> a horizontal distance <strong>of</strong> 10 NM (18.5 km) from <strong>the</strong> aerodrome, and at a<br />

height which could conflict with operations at a <strong>non</strong>-<strong>towered</strong> aerodrome.<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to review occurrences <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vic<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>of</strong> all <strong>non</strong><strong>towered</strong><br />

<strong>aerodromes</strong> <strong>in</strong> Australia <strong>in</strong> order to explore <strong>the</strong> types <strong>of</strong> safety events that<br />

occur, and <strong>the</strong> concerns raised by some pilots and <strong>in</strong>dustry stakeholders regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />

operations at <strong>non</strong>-<strong>towered</strong> <strong>aerodromes</strong>. The focus was particularly on occurrences<br />

related to airspace use, procedures, and operations.<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 709 such occurrences were reported to <strong>the</strong> ATSB between 1 January 2003<br />

and 31 December 2008. This period was chosen for analysis <strong>in</strong> order to look at<br />

occurrences prior to and after <strong>the</strong> procedural and airspace changes <strong>in</strong>troduced by<br />

NAS 2C on 24 November 2005 at all <strong>non</strong>-<strong>towered</strong> <strong>aerodromes</strong> <strong>in</strong> Australia.<br />

The bulk <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 709 occurrences illustrate <strong>the</strong> need for good communication and<br />

both awareness <strong>of</strong>, and adherence to procedures when operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vic<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>non</strong>-<strong>towered</strong> <strong>aerodromes</strong>.<br />

Occurrence types <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vic<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>of</strong> <strong>non</strong>-<strong>towered</strong> <strong>aerodromes</strong><br />

The most common airspace use and operational-related occurrence types at <strong>non</strong><strong>towered</strong><br />

<strong>aerodromes</strong> were related to communication breakdowns or <strong>in</strong>sufficient<br />

communication between pilots. Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se led to reduced situational awareness<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pilot, and reduced separation between aircraft or conflicts. Conflicts are<br />

situations where <strong>the</strong> actions <strong>of</strong> an aircraft or ground vehicle <strong>in</strong>terfered with <strong>the</strong><br />

flight <strong>of</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r aircraft. Conflicts do not necessarily result <strong>in</strong> reduced separation.<br />

Non-compliance with published <strong>in</strong>formation, notices to airmen (NOTAMs) and<br />

procedures also occurred frequently (approximately 20 per cent <strong>of</strong> occurrences).<br />

Types <strong>of</strong> errors contribut<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>non</strong>-<strong>towered</strong> aerodrome occurrences<br />

An analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> errors that contributed to all occurrences showed that both<br />

procedural errors (action and decision-related) and communication errors<br />

(<strong>in</strong>formation and action-related) were most prevalent (about 30 per cent <strong>of</strong> cases for<br />

each), followed by situational awareness and position/proximity errors (separationrelated).<br />

All <strong>the</strong>se occurrence types contributed to <strong>the</strong> 501 conflicts recorded at <strong>non</strong><strong>towered</strong><br />

<strong>aerodromes</strong> between aircraft or aircraft and ground vehicles.<br />

- xi -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!