21.03.2013 Views

Safety in the vicinity of non-towered aerodromes - Australian ...

Safety in the vicinity of non-towered aerodromes - Australian ...

Safety in the vicinity of non-towered aerodromes - Australian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2 METHODOLOGY<br />

This study is based on <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> occurrences reported to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> Transport<br />

<strong>Safety</strong> Bureau (ATSB) for <strong>the</strong> 6-year period 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2008.<br />

2.1 Data sources<br />

Occurrence data<br />

The occurrence data was sourced from <strong>the</strong> ATSB aviation occurrence database known<br />

as SIIMS (<strong>Safety</strong> Investigation Information Management System). A search <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

SIIMS database was conducted to identify occurrences <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g operations <strong>in</strong>to or<br />

near:<br />

• <strong>non</strong>-<strong>towered</strong> <strong>aerodromes</strong><br />

• aircraft land<strong>in</strong>g areas (ALAs)<br />

• o<strong>the</strong>r land<strong>in</strong>g areas <strong>in</strong> Australia, her territories, and territorial waters<br />

• at which Mandatory Broadcast Zone (MBZ) procedures applied or Common<br />

Traffic Advisory Frequency (CTAF/CTAF(R)) was used, between 1 January 2003<br />

and 31 December 2008.<br />

This search applied to all aircraft registered <strong>in</strong> Australia (on civil/VH-, military, and<br />

recreational registers) and foreign registered aircraft.<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> report<strong>in</strong>g period was subsequent to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Transport <strong>Safety</strong> Investigation Act 2003 (TSI Act) on 1 July 2003, and many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

occurrence types extracted are immediately reportable matters (IRMs) under <strong>the</strong> TSI<br />

Act. However, it was determ<strong>in</strong>ed that <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> specified reportable matters under<br />

<strong>the</strong> previous Air Navigation Act 1920 legislation was unlikely to have had a<br />

significant <strong>in</strong>fluence on <strong>the</strong> occurrence types reported. It has been observed <strong>in</strong> a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> ATSB <strong>in</strong>vestigations and research studies that <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> occurrences<br />

reported to <strong>the</strong> ATSB s<strong>in</strong>ce 1 July 2003 has <strong>in</strong>creased significantly due to <strong>the</strong><br />

improved report<strong>in</strong>g requirements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> TSI Act.<br />

The extracted occurrences were reviewed and fur<strong>the</strong>r sorted <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> sub-categories<br />

presented <strong>in</strong> this report. In particular, safety factors were coded for each occurrence <strong>in</strong><br />

terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> type <strong>of</strong> pilot and/or air traffic service error that was <strong>the</strong> primary<br />

contributor to <strong>the</strong> occurrence. The error types def<strong>in</strong>ed were:<br />

• Information errors – <strong>in</strong>dividual actions that result from a failure to perceive<br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g, perceiv<strong>in</strong>g someth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>correctly, or by not understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> situation<br />

correctly (i.e. situational awareness problems, and visual or o<strong>the</strong>r perceptual<br />

illusions).<br />

• Action errors – actions that deviate from <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual’s plans. These <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

error types commonly termed as ‘skill-based’ slips and lapses. Actions <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> precision dur<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>uous control <strong>of</strong> an aircraft are also deemed to be<br />

action errors (e.g. attempt<strong>in</strong>g to, but not succeed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> manually ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a<br />

target speed or altitude).<br />

• Decision errors - <strong>in</strong>dividual actions that result when an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s plans are not<br />

adequate for <strong>the</strong> situation.<br />

- 13 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!