Safety in the vicinity of non-towered aerodromes - Australian ...
Safety in the vicinity of non-towered aerodromes - Australian ...
Safety in the vicinity of non-towered aerodromes - Australian ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
In particular, pilots’ broadcast<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>tentions when turn<strong>in</strong>g onto f<strong>in</strong>al is especially<br />
important. See<strong>in</strong>g objects on <strong>the</strong> runway is difficult from <strong>the</strong> air, and <strong>the</strong>se may<br />
<strong>in</strong>clude stationary or backtrack<strong>in</strong>g aircraft, aircraft l<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g up for take<strong>of</strong>f, ground<br />
vehicles or ma<strong>in</strong>tenance personnel. See<strong>in</strong>g o<strong>the</strong>r aircraft <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> air, such as aircraft on<br />
straight-<strong>in</strong> approaches, is equally difficult. A 2004 review by <strong>the</strong> ATSB <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 37<br />
mid-air collisions <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g general aviation (GA) aircraft <strong>in</strong> Australia between 1961<br />
and 2003 found that almost 80 per cent (n = 29) occurred <strong>in</strong> or near <strong>the</strong> circuit area,<br />
with a third <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g aircraft on f<strong>in</strong>al approach or <strong>the</strong> base-to-f<strong>in</strong>al turn.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se collisions occurred where a faster aircraft descended upon <strong>the</strong> aircraft <strong>in</strong><br />
front. Ground collisions (which contributed to several accidents at <strong>non</strong>-<strong>towered</strong><br />
<strong>aerodromes</strong> between 2003 and 2008) can also occur on runways after land<strong>in</strong>g. The<br />
risk <strong>of</strong> both ground collisions and mid-air collisions can be reduced by mak<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
turn<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>al broadcast as a warn<strong>in</strong>g to o<strong>the</strong>r pilots on approach or on <strong>the</strong> runway.<br />
The necessity for <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r circuit broadcasts depends upon <strong>the</strong> amount and type <strong>of</strong><br />
traffic <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> circuit or approach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> circuit, as well as <strong>the</strong>ir separation and flow.<br />
They are a matter <strong>of</strong> judgement for <strong>the</strong> pilot. If <strong>the</strong> traffic flow is established,<br />
frequency congestion might be a consideration when decid<strong>in</strong>g on which circuit<br />
broadcasts to make. In comparison, if no o<strong>the</strong>r aircraft are heard or seen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> circuit,<br />
<strong>the</strong> pilot should consider mak<strong>in</strong>g every possible broadcast <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>f chance that <strong>the</strong>re<br />
is ano<strong>the</strong>r aircraft operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir vic<strong>in</strong>ity that <strong>the</strong>y are unaware <strong>of</strong>.<br />
In situations where one or more pilots do not broadcast appropriately, or are<br />
experienc<strong>in</strong>g radio difficulties, <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> potential for a breakdown <strong>in</strong> situational<br />
awareness. This may result <strong>in</strong> an airprox or some form <strong>of</strong> conflict or reduced safety<br />
marg<strong>in</strong> between an aircraft and o<strong>the</strong>r aircraft, ground vehicles, or parachutists.<br />
For this reason, it is essential to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a vigilant lookout, even when appropriate<br />
broadcasts have been made on <strong>the</strong> CTAF.<br />
While broadcasts should be made where a pilot deems <strong>the</strong>y will improve situational<br />
awareness and reduce <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> a collision, mak<strong>in</strong>g unnecessary broadcasts that have<br />
no safety value (radio chatter) contributes to frequency congestion on <strong>the</strong> CTAF, and<br />
can be a source <strong>of</strong> distraction for o<strong>the</strong>r pilots. The follow<strong>in</strong>g occurrence is a good<br />
example <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> risks <strong>of</strong> unnecessary radio chatter.<br />
Occurrence number 200506849<br />
As <strong>the</strong> aircraft was taxi<strong>in</strong>g for departure, <strong>the</strong> pilot <strong>of</strong> an arriv<strong>in</strong>g aircraft persisted <strong>in</strong> ask<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
female pilot <strong>of</strong> a depart<strong>in</strong>g aircraft questions <strong>of</strong> a personal nature over <strong>the</strong> radio. The female<br />
pilot reported that <strong>the</strong> chatter distracted her from <strong>the</strong> task <strong>of</strong> taxi<strong>in</strong>g, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> left w<strong>in</strong>g<br />
strik<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> `Welcome' archway <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> aerodrome as she was manoeuvr<strong>in</strong>g to avoid <strong>the</strong> arriv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
aircraft. The impact resulted <strong>in</strong> a hole <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> aircraft w<strong>in</strong>g approximately<br />
60 cm <strong>in</strong>board from <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>gtip.<br />
- 34 -