21.03.2013 Views

Safety in the vicinity of non-towered aerodromes - Australian ...

Safety in the vicinity of non-towered aerodromes - Australian ...

Safety in the vicinity of non-towered aerodromes - Australian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Airproxes and o<strong>the</strong>r separation issues (air-air and air-ground)<br />

Airproxes 1 and o<strong>the</strong>r situations where a separation issue occurred between two<br />

aircraft were also very common. Conflicts between aircraft and o<strong>the</strong>r aircraft or<br />

vehicles occurred <strong>in</strong> 71 per cent <strong>of</strong> occurrences. Most conflicts were due to reduced<br />

separation between aircraft <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> circuit, conflicts between aircraft on base, f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

approach, or runway <strong>in</strong>cursions. Airproxes accounted for almost all serious<br />

<strong>in</strong>cidents (55 <strong>of</strong> 60) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vic<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>of</strong> <strong>non</strong>-<strong>towered</strong> <strong>aerodromes</strong>. Separation issues<br />

generally occurred between general aviation (GA) aircraft, or <strong>in</strong>volved a GA<br />

aircraft and a passenger transport aircraft. There were very few conflicts <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

two passenger transport aircraft. Most runway <strong>in</strong>cursions <strong>in</strong>volved a backtrack<strong>in</strong>g<br />

aircraft com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to conflict with an aircraft on land<strong>in</strong>g or f<strong>in</strong>al approach to <strong>the</strong><br />

same runway.<br />

See-and-avoid conflicts<br />

See-and-avoid conflicts where situational awareness errors were <strong>in</strong>volved (also<br />

contributed to by <strong>in</strong>adequate or no communications <strong>in</strong> some cases) made up about<br />

one-seventh <strong>of</strong> all occurrences. These types <strong>of</strong> conflicts led to almost all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> six<br />

accidents recorded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vic<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>of</strong> <strong>non</strong>-<strong>towered</strong> <strong>aerodromes</strong> between 2003 and<br />

2008, four <strong>of</strong> which were mid-air collisions, and two <strong>of</strong> which were runway<br />

<strong>in</strong>cursions lead<strong>in</strong>g to a collision on <strong>the</strong> ground. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong>re were 60 serious<br />

<strong>in</strong>cidents <strong>in</strong> which an accident almost occurred. Once aga<strong>in</strong>, <strong>the</strong>se were mostly due<br />

to a lack <strong>of</strong> communication between pilots or an <strong>in</strong>sufficient awareness <strong>of</strong> nearby<br />

traffic, lead<strong>in</strong>g to an airprox. In 87 occurrences, a Traffic Collision Avoidance<br />

System (TCAS) alert occurred due to a potential separation issue. In over half <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se cases however, <strong>the</strong> TCAS alert was <strong>the</strong> only <strong>in</strong>dication that pilots <strong>of</strong> an<br />

aircraft had <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r traffic.<br />

In approximately 20 per cent <strong>of</strong> all conflicts, <strong>the</strong> pilot <strong>of</strong> one or more aircraft took<br />

avoid<strong>in</strong>g action to prevent a collision or an airprox. In a fur<strong>the</strong>r 17 per cent, one<br />

aircraft made a precautionary diversion from its <strong>in</strong>tended flight path <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> safe separation with ano<strong>the</strong>r aircraft that was not communicat<strong>in</strong>g or aware<br />

<strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r nearby aircraft.<br />

Inadequate communication between aircraft<br />

Insufficient communication and broadcasts between pilots, radio failures or<br />

misunderstand<strong>in</strong>gs were <strong>the</strong> biggest contributors to occurrences <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vic<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>non</strong>-<strong>towered</strong> <strong>aerodromes</strong> between 2003 and 2008 (388 <strong>of</strong> 709 occurrences).<br />

Communication issues accounted for 38 per cent <strong>of</strong> all <strong>in</strong>formation errors and 31<br />

per cent <strong>of</strong> all action errors for <strong>the</strong>se occurrences.<br />

Good communication between pilots on <strong>the</strong> CTAF is critical to creat<strong>in</strong>g a safe<br />

operat<strong>in</strong>g environment <strong>in</strong> uncontrolled airspace, especially <strong>in</strong> higher traffic density<br />

locations such as at <strong>non</strong>-<strong>towered</strong> <strong>aerodromes</strong>. Despite this, <strong>in</strong> almost a third <strong>of</strong> all<br />

occurrences, it was known (or likely) that <strong>the</strong> pilot was operat<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vic<strong>in</strong>ity<br />

1 An airprox is def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Transport <strong>Safety</strong> Investigation Regulations 2003 as an occurrence <strong>in</strong><br />

which two or more aircraft come <strong>in</strong>to such close proximity that a threat to <strong>the</strong> safety <strong>of</strong> those<br />

aircraft exists or may exist, <strong>in</strong> airspace where <strong>the</strong> aircraft are not subject to an air traffic separation<br />

standard or where separation is a pilot responsibility.<br />

- xii -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!