Safety in the vicinity of non-towered aerodromes - Australian ...
Safety in the vicinity of non-towered aerodromes - Australian ...
Safety in the vicinity of non-towered aerodromes - Australian ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Airproxes and o<strong>the</strong>r separation issues (air-air and air-ground)<br />
Airproxes 1 and o<strong>the</strong>r situations where a separation issue occurred between two<br />
aircraft were also very common. Conflicts between aircraft and o<strong>the</strong>r aircraft or<br />
vehicles occurred <strong>in</strong> 71 per cent <strong>of</strong> occurrences. Most conflicts were due to reduced<br />
separation between aircraft <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> circuit, conflicts between aircraft on base, f<strong>in</strong>al<br />
approach, or runway <strong>in</strong>cursions. Airproxes accounted for almost all serious<br />
<strong>in</strong>cidents (55 <strong>of</strong> 60) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vic<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>of</strong> <strong>non</strong>-<strong>towered</strong> <strong>aerodromes</strong>. Separation issues<br />
generally occurred between general aviation (GA) aircraft, or <strong>in</strong>volved a GA<br />
aircraft and a passenger transport aircraft. There were very few conflicts <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
two passenger transport aircraft. Most runway <strong>in</strong>cursions <strong>in</strong>volved a backtrack<strong>in</strong>g<br />
aircraft com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to conflict with an aircraft on land<strong>in</strong>g or f<strong>in</strong>al approach to <strong>the</strong><br />
same runway.<br />
See-and-avoid conflicts<br />
See-and-avoid conflicts where situational awareness errors were <strong>in</strong>volved (also<br />
contributed to by <strong>in</strong>adequate or no communications <strong>in</strong> some cases) made up about<br />
one-seventh <strong>of</strong> all occurrences. These types <strong>of</strong> conflicts led to almost all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> six<br />
accidents recorded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vic<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>of</strong> <strong>non</strong>-<strong>towered</strong> <strong>aerodromes</strong> between 2003 and<br />
2008, four <strong>of</strong> which were mid-air collisions, and two <strong>of</strong> which were runway<br />
<strong>in</strong>cursions lead<strong>in</strong>g to a collision on <strong>the</strong> ground. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong>re were 60 serious<br />
<strong>in</strong>cidents <strong>in</strong> which an accident almost occurred. Once aga<strong>in</strong>, <strong>the</strong>se were mostly due<br />
to a lack <strong>of</strong> communication between pilots or an <strong>in</strong>sufficient awareness <strong>of</strong> nearby<br />
traffic, lead<strong>in</strong>g to an airprox. In 87 occurrences, a Traffic Collision Avoidance<br />
System (TCAS) alert occurred due to a potential separation issue. In over half <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>se cases however, <strong>the</strong> TCAS alert was <strong>the</strong> only <strong>in</strong>dication that pilots <strong>of</strong> an<br />
aircraft had <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r traffic.<br />
In approximately 20 per cent <strong>of</strong> all conflicts, <strong>the</strong> pilot <strong>of</strong> one or more aircraft took<br />
avoid<strong>in</strong>g action to prevent a collision or an airprox. In a fur<strong>the</strong>r 17 per cent, one<br />
aircraft made a precautionary diversion from its <strong>in</strong>tended flight path <strong>in</strong> order to<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> safe separation with ano<strong>the</strong>r aircraft that was not communicat<strong>in</strong>g or aware<br />
<strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r nearby aircraft.<br />
Inadequate communication between aircraft<br />
Insufficient communication and broadcasts between pilots, radio failures or<br />
misunderstand<strong>in</strong>gs were <strong>the</strong> biggest contributors to occurrences <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vic<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>non</strong>-<strong>towered</strong> <strong>aerodromes</strong> between 2003 and 2008 (388 <strong>of</strong> 709 occurrences).<br />
Communication issues accounted for 38 per cent <strong>of</strong> all <strong>in</strong>formation errors and 31<br />
per cent <strong>of</strong> all action errors for <strong>the</strong>se occurrences.<br />
Good communication between pilots on <strong>the</strong> CTAF is critical to creat<strong>in</strong>g a safe<br />
operat<strong>in</strong>g environment <strong>in</strong> uncontrolled airspace, especially <strong>in</strong> higher traffic density<br />
locations such as at <strong>non</strong>-<strong>towered</strong> <strong>aerodromes</strong>. Despite this, <strong>in</strong> almost a third <strong>of</strong> all<br />
occurrences, it was known (or likely) that <strong>the</strong> pilot was operat<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vic<strong>in</strong>ity<br />
1 An airprox is def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Transport <strong>Safety</strong> Investigation Regulations 2003 as an occurrence <strong>in</strong><br />
which two or more aircraft come <strong>in</strong>to such close proximity that a threat to <strong>the</strong> safety <strong>of</strong> those<br />
aircraft exists or may exist, <strong>in</strong> airspace where <strong>the</strong> aircraft are not subject to an air traffic separation<br />
standard or where separation is a pilot responsibility.<br />
- xii -