21.03.2013 Views

Safety in the vicinity of non-towered aerodromes - Australian ...

Safety in the vicinity of non-towered aerodromes - Australian ...

Safety in the vicinity of non-towered aerodromes - Australian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se enroute occurrences (n = 82) <strong>in</strong>volved situations where o<strong>the</strong>r pilots <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> vic<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>of</strong> a <strong>non</strong>-<strong>towered</strong> aerodrome did not hear <strong>the</strong> recommended ‘enroute’<br />

broadcast on <strong>the</strong> CTAF from an enroute pilot. This may have been due to <strong>the</strong><br />

broadcasts not be<strong>in</strong>g made by <strong>the</strong> enroute pilot. However, distractions, low radio<br />

volume, one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> aircraft be<strong>in</strong>g tuned to an <strong>in</strong>correct frequency, radio equipment<br />

problems, or o<strong>the</strong>r situational awareness issues may have contributed to <strong>the</strong>se<br />

broadcasts not be<strong>in</strong>g heard.<br />

Clear <strong>of</strong> runway<br />

In 31 occurrences, an aircraft on f<strong>in</strong>al ei<strong>the</strong>r landed with, or was forced to conduct a<br />

go-around due to, an aircraft backtrack<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> active runway. In some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

cases, it was likely that <strong>the</strong> pilot <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> land<strong>in</strong>g aircraft had assumed that <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g<br />

aircraft had cleared <strong>the</strong> runway at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> its land<strong>in</strong>g roll, even though a ‘clear <strong>of</strong><br />

runway’ broadcast was not made (as recommended by CAR 166), or a ‘backtrack<strong>in</strong>g’<br />

broadcast had not been made. A review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 709 occurrences between 2003 and<br />

2008 found that aircraft that backtracked down a runway without mak<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

appropriate ‘backtrack<strong>in</strong>g’ broadcast led to a loss <strong>of</strong> separation assurance between<br />

two aircraft on six occasions. These situations re<strong>in</strong>force <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> listen<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

<strong>the</strong> CTAF and be<strong>in</strong>g aware <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> position and <strong>in</strong>tentions <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r operat<strong>in</strong>g aircraft.<br />

While backtrack<strong>in</strong>g broadcasts are not required, <strong>the</strong>y help to reduce <strong>the</strong> chance <strong>of</strong><br />

runway <strong>in</strong>cursions by improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> situational awareness <strong>of</strong> pilots on approach, or<br />

who are <strong>in</strong>tend<strong>in</strong>g to enter <strong>the</strong> runway.<br />

From <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation provided to <strong>the</strong> ATSB <strong>in</strong> occurrences reports, <strong>the</strong>re was not<br />

enough detail to establish whe<strong>the</strong>r pilots had made broadcasts on <strong>the</strong> CTAF <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that <strong>the</strong>y had cleared <strong>the</strong> runway.<br />

Source: Th<strong>in</strong>kstock Images<br />

- 49 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!