28.03.2013 Views

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Health and safety requirements associated with ash disposal include legislative<br />

requirement for the operator to wear full safety equipment. Further information on<br />

incineration methods is provided under scrub management.<br />

122<br />

Check with <strong>Natural</strong> England, CCW, SNH or NIEA whether burning<br />

would be consented on a legally protected site.<br />

6.5 Scrub management<br />

Specialised burning crates<br />

developed on the Whitlaw<br />

Mosses in the <strong>Scottish</strong><br />

Borders to burn vegetation<br />

cut as part of conservation<br />

management - see Case<br />

Study 6.1 for more details<br />

(A. McBride).<br />

Traditionally, scrub was kept in check by grazing and mowing. Without such<br />

active management, open fen vegetation can rapidly become colonised by scrub.<br />

Changes in agricultural management practices at a national scale in recent decades<br />

have resulted in many fen communities converting to scrub and wet woodland.<br />

Rapid colonisation of<br />

downy birch and willow<br />

scrub on Drumcrow <strong>Fen</strong><br />

in Northern Ireland as a<br />

result of abandonment of<br />

peat cutting and removal of<br />

grazing. This is threatening<br />

the diverse range of fen<br />

habitats and important<br />

invertebrate assemblage<br />

(B. Hamill).<br />

Tree removal may reduce water lost by evapo-transpiration and the interception of<br />

rainfall, which can be particularly important in summer, when precipitation tends to<br />

be lower and evaporation high. In one study the rates of evapo-transpiration from<br />

reedbeds were found to be around 98% of that from open water, whilst evapotranspiration<br />

from wet woodland was between 89% and 164%. Modelling the<br />

hydrological budget of the site is the only way to be sure whether the removal of a<br />

large stand of trees is likely to increase the height of the water-table.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!