28.03.2013 Views

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.2.1 Checking substrate fertility<br />

The upper layers of soil are often the most fertile due to enrichment from surface<br />

waters, agricultural activities or defecation by animals. Generally the underlying<br />

substrate is more likely to be nutrient-poor, and thus capable of supporting species<br />

rich vegetation.<br />

Where aims for site management include reduction of substrate fertility and<br />

encouragement of greater species diversity, samples of peat/substrate taken from<br />

different depths should be analysed to assess whether surface layers are particularly<br />

enriched in major plant nutrients. This can be assessed using a technique called<br />

phytometry (see Section 10: Monitoring to Inform <strong>Fen</strong> <strong>Management</strong>) in which<br />

seedlings of test plant species are grown in soil samples taken from different areas<br />

of the site and different depths as appropriate. The tests can be extended with<br />

and without additions of nitrogen and phosphorus. Comparisons of the biomass<br />

produced in the test and control soils shows whether or not the layer of soil being<br />

tested is already enriched with one or both of the major plant nutrients. This is often<br />

considered to be a more reliable estimate of what is available to plants than analyses<br />

of soil water and soil extracts. While such analyses are useful and informative,<br />

they may not show how much is available to the plants, especially when critical<br />

concentrations are close to the limits of detection.<br />

An indication of substrate fertility can also be obtained from noting the plants that<br />

grow in and around the margins of the proposed area for rejuvenation and comparing<br />

them with information provided in, for example, the JNCC’s Common Standards<br />

Monitoring Guidance<br />

7.2.2 Removal of silt and other sediments<br />

Heavy machinery may sink where the fen has become filled up with silt and other<br />

soft sediments. Unconsolidated silts can be removed using a suction dredger,<br />

but leaching of chemicals (such as oxidised iron) from the dredged silts can be a<br />

pollution risk. It may also be difficult to establish wetland plants in un-consolidated<br />

substrates as the plants are uprooted by wave-action.<br />

Some sediment may be rich in heavy metals such as lead, iron and manganese which<br />

may leach out. In the case of iron, oxidation may give rise to an obvious ochreous<br />

colouration and deposit. Disposal of contaminated sediments to special waste<br />

disposal sites is very costly, and requires relevant licences. In addition sediments are<br />

often rich in phosphorus which will encourage unwanted plant growth.<br />

152<br />

Works adjacent to watercourses should be carefully designed with<br />

appropriate controls to prevent silt or other contaminants entering rivers<br />

and streams.<br />

A prior desk study of local sources of possible contaminants may suggest whether<br />

there is any risk of contamination. As a precaution it is wise to analyse some of<br />

the sediment prior to removal for concentrations of heavy metals such as iron,<br />

manganese, lead, cadmium, copper and zinc.<br />

Consult your local environmental protection agency (EA, SEPA, NIEA) at the<br />

planning stage. They should be able to advise whether material will require analysis.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!