28.03.2013 Views

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Problems for invertebrates area are created by:<br />

– Carp can stir up mud to produce murky water with few plants or invertebrates: a bad problem in<br />

newly dredged ponds where carp have been introduced<br />

– Excessive clearance of water crow-foot etc from chalk rivers<br />

– Removal of woody debris<br />

– Treatment of ponds and lakes against fish-louse. Or ‘temporary’ drainage to eliminate fish/fish<br />

lice, and then restocking with fish<br />

– Fishermen excessively removing aquatic and aquatic marginal vegetation, and further destroying<br />

the wetland/water transition by building up the bank<br />

1.1.1 Spined Loach<br />

The following management recommendations for spined loach are taken from English Nature<br />

(undated).<br />

– <strong>Management</strong> which causes a reduction in habitat diversity e.g. channelization of rivers and<br />

streams should be avoided.<br />

– Regulate excess stocking of omnivorous course species such as roach and bream<br />

– Prevent introduction of non-native species such as carp to the river system<br />

– Limit any unregulated manipulations, such as the removal of pike, which in turn causes an increase<br />

in course fish species such as roach and bream<br />

– Adopt sensitive weed cutting practice. For example cutting down the centre, or perhaps one side<br />

of a channel to create a heterogeneous habitat suitable for spined loaches.<br />

– Long term management of macrophytes, through tree planting where appropriate to create shade<br />

along one bank<br />

– Dredging should not be undertaken across the whole length of the channel at a given time.<br />

Dredging in the centre of the channel, leaving undisturbed refuges may be acceptable<br />

– Dredging should not be more than once every 4 years to enable populations of spined loach to<br />

recover and achieve maximum lifespan.<br />

– Frequency of dredging maybe increased to once every 2/3 years where a rotational regime is<br />

adopted, always leaving suitable refuge areas.<br />

References and sources of further information<br />

Ausden M., Sutherland W.J. & James R. 2001 The effects of flooding lowland wet grassland on soil<br />

macroinvertebrate prey of breeding wading birds. Journal of Applied Ecology, 38: 320-338.<br />

Bradbury, R.B. & Bradter, U. 2003. Habitat associations of Yellow Wagtails Motacilla flava flavissima<br />

on lowland wet grassland. Ibis 146: 241 – 246<br />

Langton, T., Beckett, C and Foster, J. 2001. Great Crested Newt Conservation <strong>Handbook</strong>. Froglife,<br />

Halesworth.<br />

Smart, M. & Coutts. K. 2004. Footdrain management to enhance habitat for breeding waders on<br />

lowland wet grassland at Buckenham and Cantley Marshes, Mid-Yare RSPB Reserve, Norfolk,<br />

England. Conservation Evidence 1: 16-19)<br />

Strachan, R & Moorhouse, T. 2006 The Water Vole Conservation <strong>Handbook</strong>, Second edition. The<br />

Wildlife Conservation Research Unit.<br />

Youngs, T. 2005. Wet grassland practical manual: breeding waders. RSPB, Sandy, UK.<br />

311

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!