28.03.2013 Views

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

– Prioritise objectives to achieve Habitat and Species Action Plan targets.<br />

– Consult national, regional and local visions for habitats including<br />

wetlands, for example the England 50 year Wetland Vision.<br />

– Generally the rarest habitats are those which take precedence in terms<br />

of conservation management.<br />

– Balance the site owner’s wishes with statutory obligations and nature<br />

conservation objectives.<br />

– Intra-nationally agreed guidelines for setting conservation objectives,<br />

such as the JNCC’s Common Standards for Monitoring (CSM) contain<br />

much helpful information.<br />

<strong>Fen</strong>s which are characteristic of low-nutrient situations are generally<br />

regarded as conservation priorities, particularly in the UK lowlands,<br />

because of the significant loss of this type of habitat over the past 200<br />

years. Base-rich groundwater-fed fens are amongst the rarest type of<br />

fen because of the very limited existence of conditions matching their<br />

requirement for a permanent supply of low-nutrient, high base status<br />

water. Priority should therefore be given to nurturing and expanding this<br />

type of habitat where opportunities arise rather than creation of other<br />

less restricted habitats such as reedbed or wet grassland in a situation<br />

where a base-rich groundwater-fed fen could be restored.<br />

A coarse prioritisation of wetland restoration effort, based on habitat rarity and<br />

‘difficulty to restore or recreate’ has been attempted in several reports and<br />

visions (e.g. Penny Anderson Associates, 2004 and England Wetland Vision<br />

(Hume, 2008)). The main purpose of the ranking is to ensure that the very limited<br />

opportunities available to restore or create the rarer habitats are not missed but<br />

clearly each of these habitats has its own value and should not be considered<br />

‘second rate’. In some parts of the country it may only be feasible to recreate less<br />

rare habitats. The suggested order is:<br />

Lowland raised bog<br />

Base-rich groundwater-fed fen<br />

Transition mire and quaking bog<br />

Floodplain fen<br />

<strong>Fen</strong> meadow/Molinia meadows<br />

Low-diversity wet grassland<br />

Reedbed<br />

Wet woodland<br />

As always, there are exceptions where maintaining the status quo, rather than<br />

management intervention is in the best interests of nature conservation.<br />

Within the Montiaghs Moss ASSI in Northern Ireland there are areas<br />

where fen has developed on a degraded bog and is now of value in its<br />

own right. Given that raised bog is widespread in Northern Ireland, it<br />

would not be appropriate to loose the valuable fen communities, which<br />

support a rare and diverse invertebrate fauna by recreating raised bog.<br />

However, natural succession means that the fen will eventually develop<br />

into wet woodland and/or bog over a longer period of time unless it is<br />

deliberately managed to maintain fen communities. Further details of<br />

Montiagh’s Moss are included in the case study at the end of Section 7:<br />

<strong>Fen</strong> Water <strong>Management</strong>.<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!