28.03.2013 Views

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12.7 Valuing the true worth of fens<br />

Understanding and appreciation of ecosystem services and the many benefits<br />

of fens which cannot be readily quantified in economic terms has developed<br />

considerably, but recent research suggests that wetland conservation managers<br />

currently have a tendency to stick to familiar ground when identifying and realising<br />

the value of fens and other wetlands.<br />

On behalf of the Wetland Vision for England Project, McInnes (2007) reviewed six<br />

local Wetland Vision plans in relation to their recognition and use of the ecosystem<br />

services concept as a part of their planned resource and management strategy. He<br />

found that:<br />

– Reference was made to direct provision of environmental products and services,<br />

and environmental regulation services, but there were numerous potential<br />

services which were not mentioned.<br />

– More information was given on cultural than other services, and these services<br />

were explained more clearly. The language used displayed a much greater<br />

empathy with these ecosystem services than with other types, especially for<br />

recreational and educational services.<br />

– Biodiversity was not the headline objective for all projects; one project had<br />

reduction of urban flood risk at its core. The case studies demonstrated that<br />

the philosophical choice of ‘either biodiversity or ecosystem services’ had been<br />

superseded, with all projects accommodating a breadth of benefits without<br />

compromising biodiversity objectives.<br />

– There was a clear bias towards the provision of cultural services. Spiritual,<br />

inspirational, recreational, aesthetic and educational objectives are considered<br />

more important than other ecosystem services.<br />

These summarised conclusions suggest that there is almost certainly scope for<br />

identifying and realising the value of a wider range of ecosystem services. The<br />

research also raises questions which serve as a useful checklist for all those<br />

involved in fen management which if followed through, could provide necessary<br />

resources for site management whilst safeguarding the interests of conservation<br />

and biodiversity.<br />

270<br />

Checklist when considering economic aspects of fen management<br />

– Is there more scope for direct provision of fen products compatible<br />

with the maintenance of biodiversity?<br />

– Are there alternative avenues of funding to realise the value of the<br />

carbon sequestration service offered by fens e.g. local carbon<br />

offsetting schemes, or use of the government’s SPC concept?<br />

– Can the value of the flood attenuation function of a wetland be<br />

promoted, quantified and realised whilst maintaining favourable<br />

conditions for biodiversity?<br />

– What scope is there for encouraging neighbour participation in<br />

schemes to reduce hydrological or nutrient problems, for example<br />

through a linked or joint RDP application which is more likely to<br />

attract support than individual proposals?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!