28.03.2013 Views

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

There is usually some degree of subjectivity inherent in the evaluation process. In general, however,<br />

the following list should be considered when drawing up a list of features:<br />

– Species with legally protected status (Conservation Regulations, Wildlife & Countryside Act).<br />

– UKBAP Priority Species<br />

– LBAP species<br />

– Rarity criteria (Nationally Notable, Red Lists, BoCC etc.)<br />

– Significant population thresholds (e.g. 1% of population at a range of spatial scales)<br />

– Species scoring systems for assemblages (e.g. SSSI selection criteria for bird assemblages)<br />

– Evaluation criteria for EcIA – National, Regional etc<br />

– ‘Flagship’ species<br />

– Species of local interest<br />

In general, it will be normal to prioritise species of nature conservation concern i.e. UKBAP species<br />

and/or species assemblages of note (see Appendix 1). Note that for invertebrates, statuses need<br />

careful interpretation. UKBAP status is of real significance only if the species is habitat restricted and<br />

listed because of loss or decline in quality of fen habitat. Many invertebrate groups were assessed<br />

for Red Data Book and Nationally Scarce status some time ago, and many species have since<br />

changed in status, or become more widely known through increased recording; there is at best an<br />

approximate relationship between the formal conservation status of most invertebrates and reality,<br />

and an estimate needs to be made of the current actual status of each species with formal status<br />

before any assessment or management decisions are based on it. The advice of an invertebrate<br />

specialist should be sought to make such a judgement; otherwise one should assume that formal<br />

conservation status is deserved and the species should be prioritised accordingly.<br />

Habitat management requirements for invertebrates<br />

Additional considerations for invertebrate habitat management regimes are:<br />

Litter piles from cutting are useful as habitat, especially as hibernation sites; substantial piles rising<br />

well above highest water levels are preferable.<br />

Complex small-scale structure may be easier to maintain in a grazed habitat than one managed by<br />

cutting/clearing; but more prone to unplanned change.<br />

As a general rule one should aim for constancy, and make change as gradual and small-scale as<br />

possible. Avoid sudden changes in density of grazing animals, and never put on a large number of<br />

grazers to renovate a site in the early stages of management.<br />

Be tolerant of some scrub representation on ‘open’ habitat, including carr.<br />

Veteran trees and large timber lying on the ground can support special faunas.<br />

The table below describes broad management requirements for some legally protected invertebrate<br />

species. It does not include all the protected species previously identified as potentially associated<br />

with fens: there are no currently known fen populations of mole cricket, so it would be premature to<br />

suggest its management requirements, and White-clawed crayfish is not considered a fen species,<br />

merely a potential associate.<br />

318

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!