28.03.2013 Views

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

are realised. In these cases, an ‘artificial’ interim solution might be needed, and<br />

routine monitoring should be continued long-term.<br />

Always consider how any action you take to alter water levels on a fen might impact<br />

on surrounding land, for example drainage of adjacent farmland. Similarly think about<br />

how changes in the hydrology of the surrounding catchment might have affected a<br />

fen in the past, or might affect it in future.<br />

7.1.7 Monitoring<br />

Wherever possible, the hydrological effects of a remediation strategy should be<br />

assessed. Monitoring should include characterisation of the baseline (current)<br />

hydrological regime, both pre-implementation and post-implementation. The<br />

duration of monitoring depends on the likely time for the remediation strategy to<br />

take effect. Monitoring of the hydrological effects of installing a sluice to raise<br />

water levels might be possible over several hours, or days, but monitoring might be<br />

required over a much longer period, possibly years, to determine the success or<br />

otherwise of other attempts to restore the desired hydrological regime.<br />

7.2 Lowering the land level<br />

Lowering the land level on fens sometimes happens inadvertently through<br />

subsidence as a consequence of adjacent mining activity or shrinkage of the peat<br />

following hydrological changes. Most deliberate attempts at lowering land level<br />

in relation to the water table are through digging out peat or creating scrapes,<br />

generally in small areas. Old turf ponds (rectilinear features with steep sides and<br />

relatively even depths) were originally dug to provide peat for fuel, whilst scrapes<br />

(with curved, shelving margins and varied topography) have been created to improve<br />

habitat conditions for species such as wading birds and dragonflies.<br />

The cutting of peat for fuel (turbary) was widespread throughout Britain and carried<br />

on well into the mid 19th century in some areas. Most peat-based fens and bogs<br />

have been cut-over, in part at least, including the Cambridgeshire and Lincolnshire<br />

<strong>Fen</strong>s and Somerset Levels. A floating raft of species-rich vegetation developed over<br />

the former turf ponds, dominated by brown mosses and small sedges, with rarities<br />

such as fen orchid (see Section 2: <strong>Fen</strong> Flora and Fauna). By the late 20th century<br />

dense mats of reed and other wetland plants had replaced this more diverse habitat.<br />

150<br />

A series of three turf ponds<br />

dug to different depths at<br />

Whitlaw Mosses 10 years<br />

ago. The ponds replicate<br />

retting pools that were<br />

used historically to process<br />

flax. The pools were hand<br />

dug and the spoil flattened<br />

by foot in the surrounding<br />

edges to ensure turves<br />

were not colonised by tree<br />

seedlings (D.Brown).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!