Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage
Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage
Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
– Catchment land use – modification of the catchment (e.g. through agricultural<br />
intensification) can change nutrient concentrations in soils and in sub-surface<br />
and surface water entering a fen. Atmospheric inputs can be altered by changes<br />
in land use that occur in nearby catchments or in the wider area, as airborne<br />
pollutants like ammonia are able to travel long distances before being deposited.<br />
4.3.1 Limiting nutrients<br />
Plant growth depends on availability of the required nutrients; low concentrations or<br />
limited availability of essential nutrients restrict plant growth. The utilisation of some<br />
nutrients may be limited by the availability of others. For example, low nitrogen<br />
concentrations would restrict utilisation of a relative surplus of phosphate, in which<br />
case nitrogen would be the limiting nutrient, but an increase in nitrogen without a<br />
change to the amount of phosphate could quickly result in enrichment.<br />
Shortage of the nutrient that is ‘limiting’ is often the key to maintaining species-rich<br />
fen vegetation, as the growth of the more nutrient-responsive and often aggressive<br />
plants is kept in check. Any extra input of the limiting nutrient can release this<br />
‘brake’ on plant growth and enable plants to exploit more of the available nutrients,<br />
resulting in increased growth of some plants and the loss of others less able to<br />
respond to the new source of nutrient. <strong>Fen</strong>s can therefore be very vulnerable to<br />
even relatively small increases in concentration of the limiting nutrient.<br />
66<br />
Studies carried out on poor fens indicate these habitats are strongly<br />
nitrogen-limited and therefore at risk of enrichment from even marginal<br />
increases in nitrogen. Experiments in northern Sweden have shown<br />
considerable accumulation of nitrogen being associated with increasing<br />
sedge cover. In a study comparing rich-fen nutrient cycling in areas<br />
with very low and high nitrogen deposition, nitrogen mineralisation was<br />
shown to be much higher in fens receiving high nitrogen inputs, despite<br />
the fact that these fens were managed by mowing (Nohara et al., 2002).<br />
Phosphorus limitation is particularly typical of late succession habitats. In addition,<br />
where nitrogen inputs are high, and especially where there is regular biomass<br />
removal, phosphorus will usually become the limiting nutrient over time.<br />
In a nutrient limited system, excess of the non-limiting nutrient may not result in any<br />
signs of enrichment in the vegetation, as the plants are unable to make use of one<br />
nutrient without sufficient amounts of the other. This does not mean the site is not<br />
enriched, but that enrichment is not manifested in changes in the vegetation. It is<br />
likely to be detectable in soil/peat and water samples.<br />
Localised processes can have a very important bearing on the nature and<br />
significance of nutrient limitation, and the role of calcium and iron in ‘locking-up’ P in<br />
certain situations has already been mentioned.<br />
Despite the concept and nature of nutrient limitation, most researchers and<br />
practitioners agree that high nitrogen inputs to a phosphorus limited system would<br />
still be highly undesirable, not least because nutrient limitation varies between<br />
species, and only very small increases in the availability of a key limiting nutrient<br />
may be needed to result in a significant effect. Nitrogen enrichment even where<br />
not accompanied by phosphorus could also be a contributory factor in the loss of<br />
dissolved organic carbon (DOC) loss from fens.