28.03.2013 Views

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Smaller excavations are preferable because they produce more edge per unit<br />

area than a single large excavation over the same footprint. The length of the<br />

edge is important, as it provides a niche for the establishment of species-poor<br />

swamp communities dominated by lesser bulrush and common reed. A further<br />

consideration is that excavation may impede carbon sequestration through<br />

conversion to open water, and produce dry peat which will oxidise and release<br />

carbon.<br />

Clear conservation objectives will help decide whether species-poor or speciesrich<br />

swamp is required. A species-rich swamp will require management of tall<br />

species such as reed by mowing or grazing. Smaller excavations are also better<br />

because there is less material to be disposed of, and less risk of wave erosion, so<br />

allowing emergent vegetation to re-establish more rapidly from the margins, from<br />

rhizomes and from the newly-exposed seed bank.<br />

New turf ponds have been dug at Woodbastwick <strong>Fen</strong> and other<br />

localities in the Norfolk Broads using a 360º excavator with wide tracks<br />

and mats to avoid damage to the peat. Smaller (1 ha) excavations, which have been very slow to establish<br />

emergent vegetation.<br />

Removing the accumulated litter and peat to just above the level of the<br />

rhizomes of reed or other species (e.g. reedmace and common clubrush)<br />

will also allow for more rapid re-establishment without creating<br />

large areas of open water. However, <strong>Natural</strong> England have found in<br />

the Norfolk Broads that re-worked cuttings have been slow to develop<br />

a submerged or emergent vegetation cover, probably because a<br />

significant depth of loose unconsolidated organic silt makes it difficult<br />

for aquatic macrophytes to establish. The restoration of diverse fen<br />

vegetation has been much more successful where the cuttings have<br />

been carried out in ‘virgin’ fen peat. Cutting peat from intact areas in<br />

the Norfolk Broads resulted in relatively rapid re-vegetation with swamp<br />

species such as saw sedge, especially where the water depth was<br />

less than 30 cm deep. It is important to note that creation of the turf<br />

ponds coincided with dry summers in the mid-1990s and there was<br />

little inundation with water whilst the vegetation established. Care<br />

should be taken in areas of virgin peat as this could destroy a unique<br />

archaeological record of that locality.<br />

All turf ponds created in the Norfolk Broads since 1983 have been<br />

monitored, and the results of all surveys during that time reviewed.<br />

These findings are available in a report held by the Broads Authority<br />

“Broadland Turf Pond Surveys 2005 and Analysis of Data 1983-2005”.<br />

Creating shallow areas with water depths of 15 - 20 cm (max 30 cm) will favour<br />

more rapid re-vegetation with reedswamp or other pioneer vegetation.<br />

Removal of the top layers of degraded peat from Redgrave and<br />

Lopham <strong>Fen</strong> (see case study 5.2) has successfully regenerated<br />

the botanical diversity of areas (Exell 2003). Species that have reappeared<br />

include common butterwort, bog mosses, round-leaved<br />

sundew, black bog-rush, cross-leaved heath (Erica tetralix) and marsh<br />

lousewort. Turf removal has been used successfully at Cors Geirch in<br />

Wales, where localised areas of rich-fen vegetation have established<br />

in association with seepage areas.<br />

151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!