28.03.2013 Views

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

Fen Management Handbook - Scottish Natural Heritage

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mowing is usually best undertaken in late summer after the main breeding bird<br />

period, and when vegetation biomass is at its peak. Removal of cut vegetation and<br />

litter is best delayed for a few weeks to allow material to wilt, reducing the volume<br />

of material which needs to be handled.<br />

Cut material should be transported off the fen for composting or burning rather<br />

than allowing the material to compost on site, which would result in nutrients<br />

feeding back into the system. Locations for burning/composting should ideally be<br />

of no (or very limited) conservation interest, and positioned at least 10 m from any<br />

watercourse, spring head, flush or seepage zone. Where there is no other option,<br />

on-site burning might be required but should be done on a metal sheet to enable<br />

ashes to be collected and removed off-site (see section 6.4).<br />

This management is suitable for sites with moderate to high levels of enrichment as<br />

the stores of nutrients are depleted over time, and should be completed annually<br />

for best effect. Removal of cut litter and vegetation is highly desirable to achieve<br />

nutrient off-take and prevent smothering of lower plants. Mowing and removal<br />

of vegetation and litter are best undertaken on a rotational basis to allow regular<br />

removal of nutrients while disturbing only small areas of the fen habitat at any one<br />

time. Grazing is strongly recommended as a follow-on treatment. Cutting is usually<br />

combined with attempting to reduce the external inputs of nutrients where possible<br />

(see local and catchment scale management).<br />

Litter removal is similar to cutting and removal, but slightly less labour intensive.<br />

Again, the aim of this technique is to remove annual litter production before it<br />

begins to decompose thereby reducing the nutrients released back into the system.<br />

Litter removal in autumn is therefore preferable. It does not reduce those nutrients<br />

that are already translocated to the roots, so this technique is better for fens with<br />

low to moderate enrichment problems. As for material produced by cutting, the<br />

litter should be removed off site for disposal.<br />

An accumulation of litter affects the plant community by altering temperature,<br />

nutrient availability and light availability to the soil. In an experiment on a fen in<br />

northern Minnesota, litter removal increased peat temperature, increased light<br />

availability at soil level, increased the phosphorus content of above-ground plant<br />

material, and altered the plant species composition. The phosphorus results may<br />

have been due to stimulation of microbial activity following litter removal. Therefore<br />

this technique would not be suitable for sites that are P-limited, as an increase in<br />

phosphorus availability may enable excess nitrogen to be used, resulting in greater<br />

enrichment issues.<br />

Both litter and vegetation removal are best undertaken on a rotational basis to allow<br />

regular removal of nutrients while disturbing only small areas of the fen habitat at<br />

a time. This also means the technique is likely to be more manageable in terms<br />

of labour costs. Research also indicates that on drier sites where water may be<br />

a limiting factor or on bare areas where there is no canopy cover, the retention or,<br />

in cases of significant bare ground cover, the addition of litter can aid seedling<br />

germination and establishment. Therefore, litter removal as a nutrient management<br />

tool appears to be best suited to wetter sites with good vegetation cover. Drier<br />

sites with good vegetation cover may be better suited to vegetation cutting (but<br />

retention of some litter) and sites with significant areas of bare soil are likely to<br />

benefit from the addition of litter/cut vegetation to improve re-establishment of<br />

vegetation.<br />

8.4.3 Turf removal and soil stripping<br />

Another option for reducing excessive nutrients on fens is to remove the enriched<br />

surface layer in which nutrients have accumulated in plant and peat material by turf<br />

180

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!