Revolution Televised.pdf
Revolution Televised.pdf
Revolution Televised.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Respect Yourself! 125<br />
Carroll would not be deterred by her televisual representation<br />
and worked at countering this within the written media. In a 1970<br />
issue of TV Guide, featuring her portrait on the cover, Carroll addressed<br />
the contemporary black political situation, the realities of<br />
the militant organizations, and the police attacks on the Panthers.<br />
Acknowledging the recent police raid on Panther headquarters in<br />
Los Angeles, Carroll spoke with vehemence to the reporter, and her<br />
analysis of the political moment is worth quoting at length.<br />
I can understand the police not liking the Panthers, even thinking<br />
that the Panthers are a threat to the Government, but to stamp them<br />
out in that way. . . . It’s a funny thing about the Government . . .<br />
there’d be a beating or a lynching or a mutilation, the Government<br />
had such difficulty tracking them [members of the Ku Klux Klan]<br />
down, or gathering evidence about them, or taking their arms away.<br />
The police never could seem to find out who they were. But here<br />
come the Panthers . . . and all of a sudden the forces of law and<br />
order have no trouble at all finding headquarters in every city, going<br />
right in to look for arms, shooting everybody who either gives them<br />
any trouble, or looks as if they’re going to. All of a sudden the<br />
Government is strong, plenty strong. 19<br />
Carroll’s sarcasm and anger are clear, and the publication of her<br />
statements in such a mainstream periodical worked as an intervention<br />
in the televisual discourse, a way of jarring the American viewer<br />
out of the reality of Julia and into the American reality. Carroll<br />
referred to her character as a sellout in this article and questioned<br />
whether the United States would ever accept shows that are about<br />
black people who are neither stereotypes nor “superspades,” programs<br />
that would show black people simply relating to each other.<br />
At this point, she considered the changes in television for blacks:<br />
Minuscule . . . pitiful . . . minute . . . it’s a vogue. It started as a<br />
vogue. . . . I think the whole thing is going to be measured in dollars<br />
and cents. If it’s to the advantage of the management, the sponsors,<br />
they’ll keep us on. When the vogue ends, and when somebody starts<br />
counting up the profits, that’s when we’ll find out what’s going to<br />
happen. 20<br />
While it is difficult to measure the effects of such statements,<br />
their words remain evidence of black resistance within mainstream