03.04.2013 Views

Revolution Televised.pdf

Revolution Televised.pdf

Revolution Televised.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Respect Yourself! 125<br />

Carroll would not be deterred by her televisual representation<br />

and worked at countering this within the written media. In a 1970<br />

issue of TV Guide, featuring her portrait on the cover, Carroll addressed<br />

the contemporary black political situation, the realities of<br />

the militant organizations, and the police attacks on the Panthers.<br />

Acknowledging the recent police raid on Panther headquarters in<br />

Los Angeles, Carroll spoke with vehemence to the reporter, and her<br />

analysis of the political moment is worth quoting at length.<br />

I can understand the police not liking the Panthers, even thinking<br />

that the Panthers are a threat to the Government, but to stamp them<br />

out in that way. . . . It’s a funny thing about the Government . . .<br />

there’d be a beating or a lynching or a mutilation, the Government<br />

had such difficulty tracking them [members of the Ku Klux Klan]<br />

down, or gathering evidence about them, or taking their arms away.<br />

The police never could seem to find out who they were. But here<br />

come the Panthers . . . and all of a sudden the forces of law and<br />

order have no trouble at all finding headquarters in every city, going<br />

right in to look for arms, shooting everybody who either gives them<br />

any trouble, or looks as if they’re going to. All of a sudden the<br />

Government is strong, plenty strong. 19<br />

Carroll’s sarcasm and anger are clear, and the publication of her<br />

statements in such a mainstream periodical worked as an intervention<br />

in the televisual discourse, a way of jarring the American viewer<br />

out of the reality of Julia and into the American reality. Carroll<br />

referred to her character as a sellout in this article and questioned<br />

whether the United States would ever accept shows that are about<br />

black people who are neither stereotypes nor “superspades,” programs<br />

that would show black people simply relating to each other.<br />

At this point, she considered the changes in television for blacks:<br />

Minuscule . . . pitiful . . . minute . . . it’s a vogue. It started as a<br />

vogue. . . . I think the whole thing is going to be measured in dollars<br />

and cents. If it’s to the advantage of the management, the sponsors,<br />

they’ll keep us on. When the vogue ends, and when somebody starts<br />

counting up the profits, that’s when we’ll find out what’s going to<br />

happen. 20<br />

While it is difficult to measure the effects of such statements,<br />

their words remain evidence of black resistance within mainstream

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!