03.04.2013 Views

Revolution Televised.pdf

Revolution Televised.pdf

Revolution Televised.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

196 Notes to Chapter 1<br />

within U.S. popular culture; instead, there was media saturation of black<br />

images, “hyperblackness.” I argue that the first case of hyperblackness on<br />

television occurred in the 1970s. Gray’s cultural studies approach to the<br />

examination of 1980s and 1990s television is a useful framework, as he<br />

considers technologies, industrial organization, and the political economy<br />

in order to address the issues that shape commercial culture, representations<br />

of blackness, power, inequality, domination, and difference.<br />

2. J. Fred MacDonald’s Blacks and White TV is deeply entrenched<br />

in the positive/negative dichotomy of analysis. For example, the second<br />

chapter of his book is entitled “Blacks in TV: Nonstereotypes versus<br />

Stereotypes.” The chapter does not address the basis for categorization;<br />

thus, what is positive or negative is assumed to be the same to any viewing<br />

audience. While the book includes important historical material,<br />

throughout it the analysis of television programs is framed by this assumption<br />

of uniform reading. By the end of the book MacDonald shows<br />

a complete lack of class consciousness when dealing with contemporary<br />

television. In chapter 21, “The Cultural Debate,” he criticizes The Cosby<br />

Show for dealing with teenage sex and condoms through the character of<br />

cousin Pam. The introduction of Pam actually addressed the class difference<br />

in black society previously ignored on the show. MacDonald states<br />

that the show thus lost its “stately demeanor” (293). He considers cable<br />

television a problematic venue because black comics are allowed to express<br />

profanity heard only in locker rooms. He also suggests that cable<br />

stations, especially MTV, and shows such as Yo! MTV Raps have allowed<br />

urban underclass youth to “[mount] a forceful assault on middle-class<br />

norms”(294). MacDonald states that Yo! MTV Raps was “a hip-hop<br />

showcase replete with the full range of rap’s verbal transgressions—from<br />

grammatical inexactitude and sexual boasting to crude sexist ideas—plus<br />

the stifling of melodic song by the repetitive rhythm and unsophisticated<br />

chant that are the hallmarks of the musical phenomenon” (294). While<br />

he admits they are spokesmen for racial problems, he states that “angry<br />

young black men” create hostility, and thus rap artists should make their<br />

acts milder (297). Although the chapter includes many examples of this<br />

lack of class consciousness, one can analyze this critique as emblematic of<br />

the chapter. MacDonald does not discuss the problems that black artists<br />

had in getting MTV to incorporate black images. As MTV became one of<br />

the best routes to publicizing and selling music, their exclusion put black<br />

artists at a disadvantage. Second, his description of hip-hop indicates an<br />

“old school” interpretation of music; hip-hop certainly does not qualify as<br />

being mainstream melodic. However, experimental jazz created by some of<br />

the most famous musicians, such as John Coltrane and Miles Davis, often<br />

did not fit into mainstream views of music. His critique of sexual boasting<br />

also does not acknowledge that toasting and signifying are part of a long

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!