07.04.2013 Views

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

80 3 SIMULATIONS OF MOLECULAR ENSEMBLES<br />

had by modeling the larger system stochastically. That is, the explicit nature <strong>of</strong> the larger<br />

system is ignored, and its influence is made manifest by a continuum that interacts with the<br />

smaller system, typically with that influence including a degree <strong>of</strong> randomness.<br />

In Langevin dynamics, the equation <strong>of</strong> motion for each particle is<br />

a(t) =−ζ p(t) + 1<br />

m [Fintra(t) + Fcontinuum(t)] (3.29)<br />

where the continuum is characterized by a microscopic friction coefficient, ζ , and a force,<br />

F, having one or more components (e.g., electrostatic and random collisional). Intramolecular<br />

forces are evaluated in the usual way from a force field. Propagation <strong>of</strong> position and<br />

momentum vectors proceeds in the usual fashion.<br />

In Brownian dynamics, the momentum degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom are removed by arguing that<br />

for a system that does not change shape much over very long timescales (e.g., a molecule,<br />

even a fairly large one) the momentum <strong>of</strong> each particle can be approximated as zero relative<br />

to the rotating center <strong>of</strong> mass reference frame. Setting the l.h.s. <strong>of</strong> Eq. (3.29) to zero and<br />

integrating, we obtain the Brownian equation <strong>of</strong> motion<br />

r(t) = r(t0) + 1<br />

ζ<br />

t<br />

t0<br />

[Fintra(τ) + Fcontinuum(τ)]dτ (3.30)<br />

where we now propagate only the position vector.<br />

Langevin and Brownian dynamics are very efficient because a potentially very large<br />

surrounding medium is represented by a simple continuum. Since the computational time<br />

required for an individual time step is thus reduced compared to a full deterministic MD<br />

simulation, much longer timescales can be accessed. This makes stochastic MD methods<br />

quite attractive for studying system properties with relaxation times longer than those that<br />

can be accessed with deterministic MD simulations. Of course, if those properties involve<br />

the surrounding medium in some explicit way (e.g., a radial distribution function involving<br />

solvent molecules, vide infra), then the stochastic MD approach is not an option.<br />

3.4 Monte Carlo<br />

3.4.1 Manipulation <strong>of</strong> Phase-space Integrals<br />

If we consider the various MD methods presented above, the Langevin and Brownian<br />

dynamics schemes introduce an increasing degree <strong>of</strong> stochastic behavior. One may imagine<br />

carrying this stochastic approach to its logical extreme, in which event there are no equations<br />

<strong>of</strong> motion to integrate, but rather phase points for a system are selected entirely at random.<br />

As noted above, properties <strong>of</strong> the system can then be determined from Eq. (3.5), but the integration<br />

converges very slowly because most randomly chosen points will be in chemically<br />

meaningless regions <strong>of</strong> phase space.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!